PTIN vs. TUG

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

PTIN (Pacer Trendpilot International ETF) and TUG (STF Tactical Growth ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. PTIN is passively managed, while TUG is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, PTIN returned 13.26%/yr vs 21.48%/yr for TUG. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PTIN charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for TUG.

Performance

PTIN vs. TUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) and STF Tactical Growth ETF (TUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PTIN having a 15.20% return and TUG slightly higher at 15.37%.

PTIN

• 1D: -0.00%
• 1M: 0.77%
• YTD: 15.20%
• 6M: 14.16%
• 1Y: 30.23%
• 3Y*: 13.26%
• 5Y*: 6.37%
• 10Y*: —

TUG

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -0.27%
• YTD: 15.37%
• 6M: 13.66%
• 1Y: 31.40%
• 3Y*: 21.48%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTIN vs. TUG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
PTIN Pacer Trendpilot International ETF	15.20%	16.17%	3.36%	16.04%	0.03%
TUG STF Tactical Growth ETF	15.37%	20.43%	19.37%	38.24%	-12.62%

Correlation

The correlation between PTIN and TUG is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2022	0.59

The correlation between PTIN and TUG shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (all time) to 0.73 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PTIN vs. TUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTIN

PTIN Risk / Return Rank: 60
PTIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
PTIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
PTIN Omega Ratio Rank: 60
PTIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
PTIN Martin Ratio Rank: 62

TUG

TUG Risk / Return Rank: 58
TUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
TUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
TUG Omega Ratio Rank: 57
TUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
TUG Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTIN vs. TUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) and STF Tactical Growth ETF (TUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PTIN	TUG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.75	1.77	-0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	2.36	+0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.31	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.63	2.56	+0.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.92	9.38	+0.54

PTIN vs. TUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTIN Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the TUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTIN and TUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PTIN vs. TUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTIN drawdown since its inception was -21.27%, roughly equal to the maximum TUG drawdown of -22.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTIN and TUG.

Drawdown Indicators

	PTIN	TUG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.27%	-22.27%	+1.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.55%	-12.31%	+0.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.93%	-22.27%	+8.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.27%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.98%	-4.60%	+1.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.63%	-4.30%	-3.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.06%	3.36%	-0.30%

Volatility

PTIN vs. TUG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) is 7.24%, while STF Tactical Growth ETF (TUG) has a volatility of 8.62%. This indicates that PTIN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PTIN	TUG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.24%	8.62%	-1.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.29%	14.26%	+1.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.38%	17.83%	-0.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.64%	18.32%	-3.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.07%	18.32%	-4.25%

PTIN vs. TUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTIN has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than TUG's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

PTIN vs. TUG - Dividend Comparison

PTIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, more than TUG's 1.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
PTIN Pacer Trendpilot International ETF	2.20%	2.53%	2.67%	2.09%	0.41%	2.38%	0.77%	0.97%
TUG STF Tactical Growth ETF	1.49%	1.75%	4.97%	1.34%	1.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PTIN and TUG in my portfolio?

PTIN and TUG have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PTIN or TUG?

TUG has higher volatility (8.62%) compared to PTIN (7.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTIN dropped -21.27% vs TUG's -22.27%.

Which ETF is better, PTIN or TUG?

On 3-year performance, TUG leads with 21.48% vs 13.26% for PTIN. On fees, TUG is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, PTIN has been the lower-risk option at 7.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PTIN or TUG?

Over the 3-year period, TUG has performed better with a 21.48% return vs 13.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PTIN or TUG?

TUG is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for PTIN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PTIN or TUG?

PTIN has the higher dividend yield at 2.20%, compared with 1.49% for TUG.

What is the main difference between PTIN and TUG?

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and STF. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for PTIN and 0.65% for TUG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.