PTIN vs. SPLS
PTIN (Pacer Trendpilot International ETF) and SPLS (PIMCO U.S. Stocks PLUS Active Bond ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. PTIN is passively managed, while SPLS is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PTIN charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for SPLS.
Performance
PTIN vs. SPLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PTIN
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 5.28%
- YTD
- 17.03%
- 6M
- 19.24%
- 1Y
- 32.47%
- 3Y*
- 13.81%
- 5Y*
- 6.53%
- 10Y*
- —
SPLS
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 4.63%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PTIN vs. SPLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PTIN Pacer Trendpilot International ETF | 11.47% |
SPLS PIMCO U.S. Stocks PLUS Active Bond ETF | 9.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTIN and SPLS is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2026 | 0.84 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTIN vs. SPLS — Risk / Return Rank
PTIN
SPLS
PTIN vs. SPLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) and PIMCO U.S. Stocks PLUS Active Bond ETF (SPLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PTIN | SPLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.82 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.79 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PTIN | SPLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 1.88 | -1.37 |
Drawdowns
PTIN vs. SPLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTIN drawdown since its inception was -21.27%, which is greater than SPLS's maximum drawdown of -9.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTIN and SPLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTIN | SPLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.27% | -9.24% | -12.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.57% | -0.31% | -0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.67% | -1.84% | -5.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | — | — |
Volatility
PTIN vs. SPLS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTIN | SPLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.54% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.85% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.26% | 14.94% | +1.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.38% | 14.94% | -0.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.90% | 14.94% | -1.04% |
PTIN vs. SPLS - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTIN has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than SPLS's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
PTIN vs. SPLS - Dividend Comparison
PTIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, more than SPLS's 0.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTIN Pacer Trendpilot International ETF | 2.17% | 2.53% | 2.67% | 2.09% | 0.41% | 2.38% | 0.77% | 0.97% |
SPLS PIMCO U.S. Stocks PLUS Active Bond ETF | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PTIN and SPLS have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPLS is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPLS is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for PTIN.
PTIN has the higher dividend yield at 2.17%, compared with 0.22% for SPLS.
They also come from different issuers: Pacer and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for PTIN and 0.18% for SPLS.
Find the right allocation for PTIN and SPLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer