PTIN vs. COWZ
PTIN (Pacer Trendpilot International ETF) and COWZ (Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PTIN is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the Pacer Trendpilot International Index, while COWZ is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PTIN returned 6.37%/yr vs 9.86%/yr for COWZ. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PTIN charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for COWZ.
Performance
PTIN vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTIN achieves a 15.20% return, which is significantly higher than COWZ's 3.98% return.
PTIN
- 1D
- -0.00%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 15.20%
- 6M
- 14.16%
- 1Y
- 30.23%
- 3Y*
- 13.26%
- 5Y*
- 6.37%
- 10Y*
- —
COWZ
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -3.07%
- YTD
- 3.98%
- 6M
- 3.06%
- 1Y
- 16.12%
- 3Y*
- 12.63%
- 5Y*
- 9.86%
- 10Y*
- —
PTIN vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTIN Pacer Trendpilot International ETF | 15.20% | 16.17% | 3.36% | 16.04% | -15.98% | 12.26% | -0.56% | 6.75% |
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 3.98% | 8.98% | 10.64% | 14.73% | 0.19% | 42.57% | 11.65% | 6.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTIN and COWZ is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2019 | 0.55 |
The correlation between PTIN and COWZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTIN vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank
PTIN
COWZ
PTIN vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PTIN | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.25 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | 2.72 | -0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.92 | 8.01 | +1.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PTIN vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTIN drawdown since its inception was -21.27%, smaller than the maximum COWZ drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTIN and COWZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTIN | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.27% | -38.63% | +17.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.55% | -5.95% | -5.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.93% | -22.00% | +8.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.27% | -22.00% | +0.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.98% | -4.76% | +1.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.63% | -4.80% | -2.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.06% | 2.02% | +1.04% |
Volatility
PTIN vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) has a higher volatility of 7.24% compared to Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) at 3.69%. This indicates that PTIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTIN | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.24% | 3.69% | +3.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.29% | 7.55% | +7.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.38% | 11.39% | +5.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.64% | 17.64% | -3.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.07% | 19.90% | -5.83% |
PTIN vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTIN has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
PTIN vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison
PTIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, more than COWZ's 1.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.99% | 2.19% | 1.82% | 1.92% | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.54% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.95% | 0.13% |
PTIN Pacer Trendpilot International ETF | 2.20% | 2.53% | 2.67% | 2.09% | 0.41% | 2.38% | 0.77% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PTIN and COWZ have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTIN has higher volatility (7.24%) compared to COWZ (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTIN dropped -21.27% vs COWZ's -38.63%.
On 5-year performance, COWZ leads with 9.86% vs 6.37% for PTIN. On fees, COWZ is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, COWZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, COWZ has performed better with a 9.86% return vs 6.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COWZ is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for PTIN.
PTIN has the higher dividend yield at 2.20%, compared with 1.99% for COWZ.
PTIN is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while COWZ is Mid Cap Value Equities. PTIN tracks Pacer Trendpilot International Index, while COWZ tracks Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for PTIN and 0.49% for COWZ.
PTIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PTIN and COWZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer