PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTIN vs. COWZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTIN vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTIN achieves a 17.03% return, which is significantly higher than COWZ's 8.30% return.


PTIN

1D
0.21%
1M
5.28%
YTD
17.03%
6M
19.24%
1Y
32.47%
3Y*
13.81%
5Y*
6.53%
10Y*

COWZ

1D
0.11%
1M
2.05%
YTD
8.30%
6M
8.95%
1Y
22.75%
3Y*
14.62%
5Y*
10.60%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTIN vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PTIN
Pacer Trendpilot International ETF
17.03%16.17%3.36%16.04%-15.98%12.26%-0.56%6.80%
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
8.30%8.98%10.64%14.73%0.19%42.57%11.65%5.95%

Correlation

The correlation between PTIN and COWZ is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2019

0.55

The correlation between PTIN and COWZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

PTIN vs. COWZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PTIN
COWZ

Financial Services

26.5%

-

Industrials

17.6%
8.4%

Technology

15.8%
16.0%

Healthcare

8.7%
21.8%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
11.7%

Basic Materials

6.1%
3.7%

Energy

5.7%
16.9%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
10.9%

Communication Services

3.2%
10.4%

Utilities

2.6%

-

Real Estate

1.0%

-

Financial Services

PTIN
26.5%
COWZ

-

Industrials

PTIN
17.6%
COWZ
8.4%

Technology

PTIN
15.8%
COWZ
16.0%

Healthcare

PTIN
8.7%
COWZ
21.8%

Consumer Cyclical

PTIN
7.1%
COWZ
11.7%

Basic Materials

PTIN
6.1%
COWZ
3.7%

Energy

PTIN
5.7%
COWZ
16.9%

Consumer Defensive

PTIN
5.7%
COWZ
10.9%

Communication Services

PTIN
3.2%
COWZ
10.4%

Utilities

PTIN
2.6%
COWZ

-

Real Estate

PTIN
1.0%
COWZ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTIN vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTIN
PTIN Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
PTIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTIN Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
PTIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTIN Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

COWZ
COWZ Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
COWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
COWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
COWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
COWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTIN vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PTINCOWZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.37

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

4.57

-1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.79

12.47

-1.68

PTIN vs. COWZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTIN Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the COWZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTIN and COWZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PTINCOWZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

2.06

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.60

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.65

-0.13

Drawdowns

PTIN vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTIN drawdown since its inception was -21.27%, smaller than the maximum COWZ drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTIN and COWZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTINCOWZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.27%

-38.63%

+17.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.55%

-5.00%

-6.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.93%

-22.00%

+8.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.27%

-22.00%

+0.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.57%

-0.80%

+0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.67%

-4.80%

-2.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

1.83%

+1.19%

Volatility

PTIN vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) has a higher volatility of 5.54% compared to Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) at 2.50%. This indicates that PTIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTINCOWZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.54%

2.50%

+3.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.85%

7.12%

+6.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.26%

11.08%

+5.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.38%

17.63%

-3.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.90%

19.92%

-6.02%

PTIN vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTIN has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

PTIN vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison

PTIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, which matches COWZ's 2.16% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
2.16%2.19%1.82%1.92%1.96%1.48%2.54%1.96%1.67%1.95%0.13%
PTIN
Pacer Trendpilot International ETF
2.17%2.53%2.67%2.09%0.41%2.38%0.77%0.97%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PTIN and COWZ have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTIN has higher volatility (5.54%) compared to COWZ (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTIN dropped -21.27% vs COWZ's -38.63%.

On 5-year performance, COWZ leads with 10.60% vs 6.53% for PTIN. On fees, COWZ is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, COWZ has been the lower-risk option at 2.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, COWZ has performed better with a 10.60% return vs 6.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

COWZ is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for PTIN.

PTIN and COWZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 2.17%.

PTIN is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while COWZ is Mid Cap Value Equities. PTIN tracks Pacer Trendpilot International Index, while COWZ tracks Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for PTIN and 0.49% for COWZ.

COWZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTIN and COWZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer