PTIN vs. CLSM
PTIN (Pacer Trendpilot International ETF) and CLSM (ETC Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PTIN is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the Pacer Trendpilot International Index, while CLSM is a Tactical Allocation fund tracking the Actively Managed. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PTIN returned 6.92%/yr vs 3.55%/yr for CLSM. Their 0.56 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PTIN charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.82%/yr for CLSM.
Performance
PTIN vs. CLSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PTIN having a 18.60% return and CLSM slightly lower at 17.92%.
PTIN
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- 6M
- 10.29%
- YTD
- 18.60%
- 1Y
- 33.07%
- 3Y*
- 13.81%
- 5Y*
- 6.92%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.18%
CLSM
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- 6M
- 15.77%
- YTD
- 17.92%
- 1Y
- 26.80%
- 3Y*
- 12.99%
- 5Y*
- 3.55%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.57%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $151.13K | $524.40K | $331.03K | |
| $434.65K | $363.43K | $473.04K |
PTIN vs. CLSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTIN Pacer Trendpilot International ETF | 18.60% | 16.17% | 3.36% | 16.04% | -15.98% | 0.78% |
CLSM ETC Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF | 17.92% | 15.32% | 1.87% | 3.78% | -23.23% | 8.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTIN and CLSM is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2021 | 0.56 |
Over the past year, PTIN and CLSM have become more correlated (0.79) than their long-term average of 0.56, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTIN vs. CLSM — Risk / Return Rank
PTIN
CLSM
PTIN vs. CLSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) and ETC Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF (CLSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PTIN | CLSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.32 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | 3.17 | -0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.59 | 9.98 | +0.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PTIN vs. CLSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTIN drawdown since its inception was -21.27%, smaller than the maximum CLSM drawdown of -27.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTIN and CLSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTIN | CLSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.27% | -27.77% | +6.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.55% | -8.50% | -3.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.93% | -14.60% | +0.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.27% | -27.77% | +6.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -2.48% | +2.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.55% | -16.06% | +8.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 2.69% | +0.44% |
Volatility
PTIN vs. CLSM - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) and ETC Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF (CLSM) have volatilities of 4.96% and 5.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTIN | CLSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.96% | 5.10% | -0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.78% | 12.75% | +3.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.69% | 14.82% | +2.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.75% | 12.82% | +1.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.12% | 12.80% | +1.32% |
PTIN vs. CLSM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTIN has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than CLSM's 0.82% expense ratio.
Dividends
PTIN vs. CLSM - Dividend Comparison
PTIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, more than CLSM's 0.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLSM ETC Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF | 0.76% | 0.90% | 2.13% | 2.58% | 3.17% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PTIN Pacer Trendpilot International ETF | 2.14% | 2.53% | 2.67% | 2.09% | 0.41% | 2.38% | 0.77% | 0.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PTIN and CLSM have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLSM has higher volatility (5.10%) compared to PTIN (4.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTIN dropped -21.27% vs CLSM's -27.77%.
On 5-year performance, PTIN leads with 6.92% vs 3.55% for CLSM. On fees, PTIN is cheaper at 0.66% per year. On volatility, PTIN has been the lower-risk option at 4.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PTIN has performed better with a 6.92% return vs 3.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PTIN is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for CLSM.
PTIN has the higher dividend yield at 2.14%, compared with 0.76% for CLSM.
PTIN is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while CLSM is Tactical Allocation. PTIN tracks Pacer Trendpilot International Index, while CLSM tracks Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Cabana. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for PTIN and 0.82% for CLSM.
PTIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PTIN and CLSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer