PTF vs. VGT
PTF (Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PTF is a Momentum fund tracking the DWA Technology Technical Leaders Index, while VGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PTF returned 26.93%/yr vs 25.78%/yr for VGT. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PTF charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VGT.
Performance
PTF vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTF achieves a 77.58% return, which is significantly higher than VGT's 31.64% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PTF having a 26.93% annualized return and VGT not far behind at 25.78%.
PTF
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 19.05%
- YTD
- 77.58%
- 6M
- 74.93%
- 1Y
- 109.08%
- 3Y*
- 43.28%
- 5Y*
- 23.79%
- 10Y*
- 26.93%
VGT
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- 18.07%
- YTD
- 31.64%
- 6M
- 30.51%
- 1Y
- 60.15%
- 3Y*
- 33.48%
- 5Y*
- 22.23%
- 10Y*
- 25.78%
PTF vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTF Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF | 77.58% | 5.68% | 43.65% | 33.73% | -31.75% | 18.10% | 82.06% | 46.71% | 0.01% | 32.07% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 31.64% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -29.70% | 30.45% | 46.04% | 48.62% | 2.46% | 37.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTF and VGT is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2006 | 0.85 |
The correlation between PTF and VGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
PTF vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PTF
VGT
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Energy
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
PTF
VGT
Communication Services
PTF
VGT
Industrials
PTF
VGT
Energy
PTF
VGT
Financial Services
PTF
VGT
Basic Materials
PTF
-
VGT
Consumer Cyclical
PTF
-
VGT
Consumer Defensive
PTF
-
VGT
-
Healthcare
PTF
-
VGT
Real Estate
PTF
-
VGT
-
Utilities
PTF
-
VGT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTF vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank
PTF
VGT
PTF vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PTF | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.47 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.10 | 3.69 | +2.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.27 | 11.77 | +12.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PTF | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.86 | 2.95 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.89 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 | 1.05 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.68 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
PTF vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTF drawdown since its inception was -55.38%, roughly equal to the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTF and VGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTF | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.38% | -54.63% | -0.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.99% | -16.40% | -1.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.11% | -27.23% | -8.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.88% | -35.07% | -9.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.88% | -35.07% | -9.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.48% | +1.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.27% | -7.95% | -5.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.51% | 5.13% | -0.62% |
Volatility
PTF vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) has a higher volatility of 13.27% compared to Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) at 6.39%. This indicates that PTF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTF | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.27% | 6.39% | +6.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.47% | 16.07% | +13.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.39% | 20.57% | +17.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.95% | 25.18% | +9.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.94% | 24.60% | +8.34% |
PTF vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTF has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
PTF vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
PTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than VGT's 0.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTF Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF | 0.01% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.04% | 0.26% | 0.00% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.31% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PTF and VGT have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTF has higher volatility (13.27%) compared to VGT (6.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTF dropped -55.38% vs VGT's -54.63%.
On 10-year performance, PTF leads with 26.93% vs 25.78% for VGT. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VGT has been the lower-risk option at 6.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PTF has performed better with a 26.93% return vs 25.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTF.
VGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.31%, compared with 0.01% for PTF.
PTF is categorized as Momentum, while VGT is Technology Equities. PTF tracks DWA Technology Technical Leaders Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTF and 0.09% for VGT.
VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 2.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PTF and VGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer