PTF vs. USVM
PTF (Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF) and USVM (VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds - PTF tracks the Dorsey Wright Technology Technical Leaders Index while USVM tracks the Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PTF returned 18.13%/yr vs 11.92%/yr for USVM. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PTF charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for USVM.
Performance
PTF vs. USVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTF achieves a 42.26% return, which is significantly higher than USVM's 20.98% return.
PTF
- 1D
- -3.81%
- 1M
- -20.00%
- 6M
- 31.78%
- YTD
- 42.26%
- 1Y
- 60.82%
- 3Y*
- 29.39%
- 5Y*
- 18.13%
- 10Y*
- 23.75%
USVM
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 1.87%
- 6M
- 14.83%
- YTD
- 20.98%
- 1Y
- 33.64%
- 3Y*
- 19.45%
- 5Y*
- 11.92%
- 10Y*
- —
PTF vs. USVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTF Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF | 42.26% | 5.68% | 43.65% | 33.73% | -31.75% | 18.10% | 82.06% | 46.71% | 0.01% | 0.67% |
USVM VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF | 20.98% | 10.56% | 16.59% | 18.90% | -13.23% | 24.44% | 11.56% | 21.65% | -9.39% | 2.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTF and USVM is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2017 | 0.66 |
The correlation between PTF and USVM shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PTF vs. USVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PTF
USVM
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Energy
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
PTF
USVM
Communication Services
PTF
USVM
Industrials
PTF
USVM
Energy
PTF
USVM
Financial Services
PTF
USVM
Basic Materials
PTF
-
USVM
Consumer Cyclical
PTF
-
USVM
Consumer Defensive
PTF
-
USVM
Healthcare
PTF
-
USVM
Real Estate
PTF
-
USVM
Utilities
PTF
-
USVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTF vs. USVM — Risk / Return Rank
PTF
USVM
PTF vs. USVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PTF | USVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.40 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.80 | 4.04 | -1.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.19 | 15.31 | -5.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PTF vs. USVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTF drawdown since its inception was -55.38%, which is greater than USVM's maximum drawdown of -42.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTF and USVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTF | USVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.38% | -42.38% | -13.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.86% | -8.36% | -13.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.11% | -24.34% | -11.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.88% | -25.27% | -19.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.36% | -0.24% | -21.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.25% | -7.80% | -5.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.99% | 2.20% | +3.79% |
Volatility
PTF vs. USVM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) has a higher volatility of 22.58% compared to VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) at 2.81%. This indicates that PTF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTF | USVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.58% | 2.81% | +19.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.35% | 10.85% | +26.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.58% | 14.80% | +30.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.62% | 19.56% | +17.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.83% | 21.90% | +11.93% |
PTF vs. USVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTF has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than USVM's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
PTF vs. USVM - Dividend Comparison
PTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than USVM's 1.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTF Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF | 0.01% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.04% | 0.26% |
USVM VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF | 1.82% | 1.84% | 1.75% | 1.63% | 1.43% | 0.70% | 1.21% | 1.77% | 1.43% | 0.65% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PTF and USVM have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTF has higher volatility (22.58%) compared to USVM (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTF dropped -55.38% vs USVM's -42.38%.
On 5-year performance, PTF leads with 18.13% vs 11.92% for USVM. On fees, USVM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, USVM has been the lower-risk option at 2.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PTF has performed better with a 18.13% return vs 11.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USVM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTF.
USVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 0.01% for PTF.
PTF tracks Dorsey Wright Technology Technical Leaders Index, while USVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTF and 0.29% for USVM.
USVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PTF and USVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer