PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTF vs. USVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTF vs. USVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTF achieves a 42.26% return, which is significantly higher than USVM's 20.98% return.


PTF

1D
-3.81%
1M
-20.00%
6M
31.78%
YTD
42.26%
1Y
60.82%
3Y*
29.39%
5Y*
18.13%
10Y*
23.75%

USVM

1D
0.52%
1M
1.87%
6M
14.83%
YTD
20.98%
1Y
33.64%
3Y*
19.45%
5Y*
11.92%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTF vs. USVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PTF
Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF
42.26%5.68%43.65%33.73%-31.75%18.10%82.06%46.71%0.01%0.67%
USVM
VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF
20.98%10.56%16.59%18.90%-13.23%24.44%11.56%21.65%-9.39%2.06%

Correlation

The correlation between PTF and USVM is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2017

0.66

The correlation between PTF and USVM shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PTF vs. USVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PTF
USVM

Technology

93.8%
8.7%

Communication Services

4.7%
3.0%

Industrials

1.8%
10.6%

Energy

1.6%
5.1%

Financial Services

1.5%
25.1%

Basic Materials

-

1.7%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.7%

Healthcare

-

12.8%

Real Estate

-

9.6%

Utilities

-

7.4%

Technology

PTF
93.8%
USVM
8.7%

Communication Services

PTF
4.7%
USVM
3.0%

Industrials

PTF
1.8%
USVM
10.6%

Energy

PTF
1.6%
USVM
5.1%

Financial Services

PTF
1.5%
USVM
25.1%

Basic Materials

PTF

-

USVM
1.7%

Consumer Cyclical

PTF

-

USVM
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

PTF

-

USVM
3.7%

Healthcare

PTF

-

USVM
12.8%

Real Estate

PTF

-

USVM
9.6%

Utilities

PTF

-

USVM
7.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTF vs. USVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTF
PTF Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
PTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTF Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
PTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTF Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

USVM
USVM Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
USVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
USVM Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
USVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
USVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTF vs. USVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PTFUSVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.40

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

4.04

-1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.19

15.31

-5.12

PTF vs. USVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTF Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is lower than the USVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTF and USVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PTF vs. USVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTF drawdown since its inception was -55.38%, which is greater than USVM's maximum drawdown of -42.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTF and USVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTFUSVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.38%

-42.38%

-13.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.86%

-8.36%

-13.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.11%

-24.34%

-11.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.88%

-25.27%

-19.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.36%

-0.24%

-21.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.25%

-7.80%

-5.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.99%

2.20%

+3.79%

Volatility

PTF vs. USVM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) has a higher volatility of 22.58% compared to VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) at 2.81%. This indicates that PTF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTFUSVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.58%

2.81%

+19.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.35%

10.85%

+26.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.58%

14.80%

+30.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.62%

19.56%

+17.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.83%

21.90%

+11.93%

PTF vs. USVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTF has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than USVM's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

PTF vs. USVM - Dividend Comparison

PTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than USVM's 1.82% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PTF
Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF
0.01%0.21%0.00%0.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.08%0.04%0.26%
USVM
VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF
1.82%1.84%1.75%1.63%1.43%0.70%1.21%1.77%1.43%0.65%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PTF and USVM have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTF has higher volatility (22.58%) compared to USVM (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTF dropped -55.38% vs USVM's -42.38%.

On 5-year performance, PTF leads with 18.13% vs 11.92% for USVM. On fees, USVM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, USVM has been the lower-risk option at 2.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PTF has performed better with a 18.13% return vs 11.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USVM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTF.

USVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 0.01% for PTF.

PTF tracks Dorsey Wright Technology Technical Leaders Index, while USVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTF and 0.29% for USVM.

USVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTF and USVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer