PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTF vs. SMOM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTF vs. SMOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) and Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF (SMOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTF achieves a 41.44% return, which is significantly higher than SMOM's 11.75% return.


PTF

1D
6.41%
1M
-4.61%
6M
23.32%
YTD
41.44%
1Y
53.98%
3Y*
30.70%
5Y*
16.16%
10Y*
23.35%
ALL TIME*
13.87%

SMOM

1D
1.80%
1M
4.08%
6M
11.56%
YTD
11.75%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$25.15M$20.80M$16.47M
$263.09K$199.51K$176.30K

PTF vs. SMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PTF and SMOM is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025

0.71

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTF vs. SMOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PTF
PTF Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
PTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTF Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
PTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTF Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

SMOM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PTF vs. SMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) and Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF (SMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PTFSMOMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.17

PTF vs. SMOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PTF vs. SMOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTF drawdown since its inception was -55.38%, which is greater than SMOM's maximum drawdown of -7.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTF and SMOM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTFSMOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.38%

-7.45%

-47.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.81%

0.00%

-21.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.29%

-1.47%

-11.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.81%

Volatility

PTF vs. SMOM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTFSMOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.31%

12.50%

+38.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.11%

12.50%

+25.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.66%

12.50%

+22.16%

PTF vs. SMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTF has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than SMOM's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

PTF vs. SMOM - Dividend Comparison

PTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than SMOM's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PTF
Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF
0.01%0.21%0.00%0.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.08%0.04%0.26%
SMOM
Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF
0.14%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PTF and SMOM have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PTF is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PTF is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for SMOM.

SMOM has the higher dividend yield at 0.14%, compared with 0.01% for PTF.

PTF is categorized as Momentum, while SMOM is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Symmetry Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTF and 0.63% for SMOM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTF and SMOM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer