PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTF vs. RSP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTF vs. RSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTF achieves a 69.43% return, which is significantly higher than RSP's 9.94% return. Over the past 10 years, PTF has outperformed RSP with an annualized return of 26.71%, while RSP has yielded a comparatively lower 12.23% annualized return.


PTF

1D
-6.34%
1M
5.02%
YTD
69.43%
6M
64.22%
1Y
96.10%
3Y*
41.16%
5Y*
21.25%
10Y*
26.71%

RSP

1D
-0.34%
1M
1.51%
YTD
9.94%
6M
9.07%
1Y
18.97%
3Y*
14.87%
5Y*
8.63%
10Y*
12.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTF vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PTF
Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF
69.43%5.68%43.65%33.73%-31.75%18.10%82.06%46.71%0.01%32.07%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
9.94%11.21%12.79%13.70%-11.62%29.41%12.66%28.91%-7.84%18.52%

Correlation

The correlation between PTF and RSP is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2006

0.70

The correlation between PTF and RSP shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PTF vs. RSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PTF
RSP

Technology

93.8%
20.9%

Communication Services

4.7%
3.9%

Industrials

1.8%
14.2%

Energy

1.6%
4.0%

Financial Services

1.5%
13.9%

Basic Materials

-

3.9%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.4%

Healthcare

-

11.1%

Real Estate

-

6.1%

Utilities

-

5.7%

Technology

PTF
93.8%
RSP
20.9%

Communication Services

PTF
4.7%
RSP
3.9%

Industrials

PTF
1.8%
RSP
14.2%

Energy

PTF
1.6%
RSP
4.0%

Financial Services

PTF
1.5%
RSP
13.9%

Basic Materials

PTF

-

RSP
3.9%

Consumer Cyclical

PTF

-

RSP
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

PTF

-

RSP
6.4%

Healthcare

PTF

-

RSP
11.1%

Real Estate

PTF

-

RSP
6.1%

Utilities

PTF

-

RSP
5.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTF vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTF
PTF Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
PTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTF Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
PTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTF Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

RSP
RSP Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
RSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSP Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
RSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSP Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTF vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PTFRSPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.28

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.37

2.43

+2.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.37

9.17

+11.21

PTF vs. RSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTF Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is higher than the RSP Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTF and RSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PTF vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTF drawdown since its inception was -55.38%, smaller than the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTF and RSP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTFRSPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.38%

-59.92%

+4.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.99%

-7.85%

-10.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.11%

-17.81%

-18.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.88%

-21.38%

-23.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.88%

-39.04%

-5.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.34%

-1.49%

-4.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.25%

-6.64%

-6.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.73%

2.07%

+2.66%

Volatility

PTF vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) has a higher volatility of 17.66% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) at 3.63%. This indicates that PTF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTFRSPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.66%

3.63%

+14.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.05%

8.68%

+23.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.37%

11.82%

+29.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.58%

16.20%

+19.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.29%

18.33%

+14.96%

PTF vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTF has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

PTF vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison

PTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than RSP's 1.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PTF
Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF
0.01%0.21%0.00%0.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.08%0.04%0.26%0.00%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
1.53%1.64%1.52%1.64%1.82%1.28%1.64%1.69%2.02%1.52%1.20%1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


PTF and RSP have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTF has higher volatility (17.66%) compared to RSP (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTF dropped -55.38% vs RSP's -59.92%.

On 10-year performance, PTF leads with 26.71% vs 12.23% for RSP. On fees, RSP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, RSP has been the lower-risk option at 3.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PTF has performed better with a 26.71% return vs 12.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTF.

RSP has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 0.01% for PTF.

PTF is categorized as Momentum, while RSP is S&P 500. PTF tracks Dorsey Wright Technology Technical Leaders Index, while RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTF and 0.20% for RSP.

PTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTF and RSP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer