PTF vs. PTH
PTF (Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF) and PTH (Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds from Invesco - PTF tracks the Dorsey Wright Technology Technical Leaders Index while PTH tracks the Dorsey Wright Healthcare Technical Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PTF returned 23.75%/yr vs 14.90%/yr for PTH. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.
Performance
PTF vs. PTH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTF achieves a 42.26% return, which is significantly higher than PTH's 20.37% return. Over the past 10 years, PTF has outperformed PTH with an annualized return of 23.75%, while PTH has yielded a comparatively lower 14.90% annualized return.
PTF
- 1D
- -3.81%
- 1M
- -20.00%
- 6M
- 31.78%
- YTD
- 42.26%
- 1Y
- 60.82%
- 3Y*
- 29.39%
- 5Y*
- 18.13%
- 10Y*
- 23.75%
PTH
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 14.88%
- 6M
- 20.08%
- YTD
- 20.37%
- 1Y
- 62.87%
- 3Y*
- 15.15%
- 5Y*
- 2.78%
- 10Y*
- 14.90%
PTF vs. PTH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTF Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF | 42.26% | 5.68% | 43.65% | 33.73% | -31.75% | 18.10% | 82.06% | 46.71% | 0.01% | 32.07% |
PTH Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF | 20.37% | 27.91% | 2.36% | -4.54% | -20.61% | -3.20% | 67.26% | 34.45% | -1.23% | 50.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTF and PTH is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2006 | 0.68 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PTF and PTH has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PTF vs. PTH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PTF
PTH
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
PTF
PTH
-
Communication Services
PTF
PTH
-
Industrials
PTF
PTH
-
Energy
PTF
PTH
-
Financial Services
PTF
PTH
Basic Materials
PTF
-
PTH
-
Consumer Cyclical
PTF
-
PTH
-
Consumer Defensive
PTF
-
PTH
-
Healthcare
PTF
-
PTH
Real Estate
PTF
-
PTH
-
Utilities
PTF
-
PTH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTF vs. PTH — Risk / Return Rank
PTF
PTH
PTF vs. PTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) and Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PTF | PTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.42 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.80 | 5.27 | -2.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.19 | 13.34 | -3.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PTF vs. PTH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTF drawdown since its inception was -55.38%, roughly equal to the maximum PTH drawdown of -53.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTF and PTH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTF | PTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.38% | -53.52% | -1.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.86% | -11.98% | -9.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.11% | -27.51% | -8.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.88% | -50.07% | +5.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.88% | -53.52% | +8.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.36% | -2.99% | -18.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.25% | -16.95% | +3.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.99% | 4.73% | +1.26% |
Volatility
PTF vs. PTH - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) has a higher volatility of 22.58% compared to Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH) at 6.53%. This indicates that PTF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTF | PTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.58% | 6.53% | +16.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.35% | 19.15% | +18.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.58% | 24.26% | +21.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.62% | 25.65% | +10.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.83% | 27.32% | +6.51% |
PTF vs. PTH - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PTF and PTH have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Dividends
PTF vs. PTH - Dividend Comparison
PTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than PTH's 2.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTF Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF | 0.01% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.04% | 0.26% |
PTH Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF | 2.55% | 3.07% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PTF and PTH have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTF has higher volatility (22.58%) compared to PTH (6.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTF dropped -55.38% vs PTH's -53.52%.
On 10-year performance, PTF leads with 23.75% vs 14.90% for PTH. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, PTH has been the lower-risk option at 6.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PTF has performed better with a 23.75% return vs 14.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PTF and PTH have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.
PTH has the higher dividend yield at 2.55%, compared with 0.01% for PTF.
PTF tracks Dorsey Wright Technology Technical Leaders Index, while PTH tracks Dorsey Wright Healthcare Technical Leaders Index.
PTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PTF and PTH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer