PTF vs. IQM
PTF (Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF) and IQM (Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PTF is a Momentum fund tracking the DWA Technology Technical Leaders Index, while IQM is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. PTF is passively managed, while IQM is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PTF returned 23.79%/yr vs 22.22%/yr for IQM. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PTF charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for IQM.
Performance
PTF vs. IQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTF achieves a 77.58% return, which is significantly higher than IQM's 40.18% return.
PTF
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 19.05%
- YTD
- 77.58%
- 6M
- 74.93%
- 1Y
- 109.08%
- 3Y*
- 43.28%
- 5Y*
- 23.79%
- 10Y*
- 26.93%
IQM
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 11.94%
- YTD
- 40.18%
- 6M
- 38.57%
- 1Y
- 75.07%
- 3Y*
- 37.62%
- 5Y*
- 22.22%
- 10Y*
- —
PTF vs. IQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTF Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF | 77.58% | 5.68% | 43.65% | 33.73% | -31.75% | 18.10% | 84.45% |
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF | 40.18% | 30.76% | 31.03% | 41.06% | -33.36% | 25.18% | 78.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTF and IQM is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2020 | 0.87 |
The correlation between PTF and IQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
PTF vs. IQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PTF
IQM
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Energy
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
PTF
IQM
Communication Services
PTF
IQM
Industrials
PTF
IQM
Energy
PTF
IQM
Financial Services
PTF
IQM
-
Basic Materials
PTF
-
IQM
-
Consumer Cyclical
PTF
-
IQM
Consumer Defensive
PTF
-
IQM
-
Healthcare
PTF
-
IQM
Real Estate
PTF
-
IQM
-
Utilities
PTF
-
IQM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTF vs. IQM — Risk / Return Rank
PTF
IQM
PTF vs. IQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PTF | IQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.43 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.10 | 5.13 | +0.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.27 | 16.79 | +7.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PTF | IQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.86 | 2.67 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.77 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.96 | -0.43 |
Drawdowns
PTF vs. IQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTF drawdown since its inception was -55.38%, which is greater than IQM's maximum drawdown of -44.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTF and IQM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTF | IQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.38% | -44.91% | -10.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.99% | -14.71% | -3.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.11% | -30.42% | -5.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.88% | -44.91% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.37% | +0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.27% | -12.25% | -1.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.51% | 4.49% | +0.02% |
Volatility
PTF vs. IQM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) has a higher volatility of 13.27% compared to Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) at 9.20%. This indicates that PTF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTF | IQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.27% | 9.20% | +4.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.47% | 22.92% | +6.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.39% | 28.27% | +10.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.95% | 28.91% | +6.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.94% | 30.72% | +2.22% |
PTF vs. IQM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTF has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IQM's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
PTF vs. IQM - Dividend Comparison
PTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while IQM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PTF Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF | 0.01% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.04% | 0.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PTF and IQM have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTF has higher volatility (13.27%) compared to IQM (9.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTF dropped -55.38% vs IQM's -44.91%.
On 5-year performance, PTF leads with 23.79% vs 22.22% for IQM. On fees, IQM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, IQM has been the lower-risk option at 9.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PTF has performed better with a 23.79% return vs 22.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IQM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTF.
PTF has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for IQM.
PTF is categorized as Momentum, while IQM is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTF and 0.50% for IQM.
PTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 2.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PTF and IQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer