PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTEZX vs. MUHLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTEZX vs. MUHLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Core Equity Fund (PTEZX) and Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTEZX achieves a 11.84% return, which is significantly higher than MUHLX's 11.04% return. Over the past 10 years, PTEZX has outperformed MUHLX with an annualized return of 16.30%, while MUHLX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.74% annualized return.


PTEZX

1D
-0.66%
1M
3.71%
YTD
11.84%
6M
12.42%
1Y
30.16%
3Y*
27.32%
5Y*
16.38%
10Y*
16.30%

MUHLX

1D
-0.44%
1M
-1.78%
YTD
11.04%
6M
11.42%
1Y
23.51%
3Y*
13.75%
5Y*
10.43%
10Y*
10.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTEZX vs. MUHLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PTEZX
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Core Equity Fund
11.84%16.65%39.29%26.67%-16.52%29.12%11.22%33.36%-7.50%23.38%
MUHLX
Muhlenkamp Fund
11.04%17.82%3.38%13.92%2.89%28.98%11.96%14.39%-13.29%18.78%

Correlation

The correlation between PTEZX and MUHLX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2000

0.86

Over the past year, the correlation between PTEZX and MUHLX has dropped to 0.60 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTEZX vs. MUHLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTEZX
PTEZX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
PTEZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTEZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTEZX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
PTEZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTEZX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

MUHLX
MUHLX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
MUHLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUHLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUHLX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
MUHLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUHLX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTEZX vs. MUHLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Core Equity Fund (PTEZX) and Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PTEZXMUHLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.29

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.50

2.28

+1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.54

8.59

+7.95

PTEZX vs. MUHLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTEZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is higher than the MUHLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTEZX and MUHLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PTEZXMUHLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

1.67

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.72

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.63

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.52

-0.09

Drawdowns

PTEZX vs. MUHLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTEZX drawdown since its inception was -55.81%, smaller than the maximum MUHLX drawdown of -62.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTEZX and MUHLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTEZXMUHLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.81%

-62.05%

+6.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.66%

-10.23%

+1.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.20%

-18.63%

-7.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.20%

-18.63%

-7.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.19%

-40.85%

+4.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-3.98%

+3.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.66%

-10.77%

-0.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

2.71%

-0.88%

Volatility

PTEZX vs. MUHLX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Core Equity Fund (PTEZX) and Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX) have volatilities of 3.02% and 3.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTEZXMUHLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.02%

3.13%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.46%

10.95%

-1.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.37%

13.97%

-1.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.96%

14.62%

+5.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.88%

17.04%

+2.84%

PTEZX vs. MUHLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTEZX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than MUHLX's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

PTEZX vs. MUHLX - Dividend Comparison

PTEZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.29%, more than MUHLX's 3.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MUHLX
Muhlenkamp Fund
3.00%3.34%0.58%0.89%6.80%7.77%10.28%1.26%14.70%4.30%0.00%11.02%
PTEZX
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Core Equity Fund
10.29%11.51%20.91%3.55%2.72%16.00%2.38%6.76%23.24%15.58%5.37%5.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


PTEZX and MUHLX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MUHLX has higher volatility (3.13%) compared to PTEZX (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTEZX dropped -55.81% vs MUHLX's -62.05%.

PTEZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTEZX and MUHLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer