PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTEZX vs. PDBZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTEZX vs. PDBZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Core Equity Fund (PTEZX) and PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTEZX achieves a 11.49% return, which is significantly higher than PDBZX's 0.38% return. Over the past 10 years, PTEZX has outperformed PDBZX with an annualized return of 16.65%, while PDBZX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.79% annualized return.


PTEZX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.79%
YTD
11.49%
6M
10.48%
1Y
29.11%
3Y*
26.33%
5Y*
16.43%
10Y*
16.65%

PDBZX

1D
-0.33%
1M
0.74%
YTD
0.38%
6M
0.85%
1Y
5.00%
3Y*
5.19%
5Y*
0.67%
10Y*
2.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTEZX vs. PDBZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PTEZX
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Core Equity Fund
11.49%16.65%39.29%26.67%-16.52%29.12%11.22%33.36%-7.50%23.38%
PDBZX
PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z
0.38%7.70%2.87%7.70%-14.33%-1.46%8.01%14.76%-0.72%6.60%

Correlation

The correlation between PTEZX and PDBZX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2000

-0.11

The correlation between PTEZX and PDBZX shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (all time) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTEZX vs. PDBZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTEZX
PTEZX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
PTEZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTEZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTEZX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
PTEZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTEZX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

PDBZX
PDBZX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
PDBZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDBZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDBZX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
PDBZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDBZX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTEZX vs. PDBZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Core Equity Fund (PTEZX) and PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PTEZXPDBZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.23

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.51

1.76

+1.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.16

4.96

+11.21

PTEZX vs. PDBZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTEZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is higher than the PDBZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTEZX and PDBZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PTEZX vs. PDBZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTEZX drawdown since its inception was -55.81%, which is greater than PDBZX's maximum drawdown of -20.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTEZX and PDBZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTEZXPDBZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.81%

-20.88%

-34.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.66%

-3.00%

-5.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.20%

-5.51%

-20.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.20%

-20.81%

-5.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.19%

-20.88%

-15.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-1.62%

+0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.64%

-2.30%

-9.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

1.06%

+0.82%

Volatility

PTEZX vs. PDBZX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Core Equity Fund (PTEZX) has a higher volatility of 4.67% compared to PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX) at 1.93%. This indicates that PTEZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDBZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTEZXPDBZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.67%

1.93%

+2.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.20%

3.36%

+6.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.94%

4.31%

+8.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.03%

6.05%

+13.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.92%

5.38%

+14.54%

PTEZX vs. PDBZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PTEZX and PDBZX have an expense ratio of 0.49%.


Dividends

PTEZX vs. PDBZX - Dividend Comparison

PTEZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.32%, more than PDBZX's 4.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PDBZX
PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z
4.58%4.54%4.79%4.60%5.73%2.73%2.94%10.36%4.01%2.87%3.92%3.33%
PTEZX
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Core Equity Fund
10.32%11.51%20.91%3.55%2.72%16.00%2.38%6.76%23.24%15.58%5.37%5.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


PTEZX and PDBZX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTEZX has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to PDBZX (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTEZX dropped -55.81% vs PDBZX's -20.88%.

PTEZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTEZX and PDBZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer