PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTEU vs. NORW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTEU vs. NORW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Trendpilot European Index ETF (PTEU) and Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTEU achieves a 6.24% return, which is significantly lower than NORW's 26.31% return. Over the past 10 years, PTEU has underperformed NORW with an annualized return of 4.25%, while NORW has yielded a comparatively higher 9.61% annualized return.


PTEU

1D
-0.68%
1M
4.65%
YTD
6.24%
6M
8.48%
1Y
18.27%
3Y*
10.93%
5Y*
7.24%
10Y*
4.25%

NORW

1D
-0.52%
1M
-2.27%
YTD
26.31%
6M
31.64%
1Y
36.12%
3Y*
23.02%
5Y*
7.99%
10Y*
9.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTEU vs. NORW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PTEU
Pacer Trendpilot European Index ETF
6.24%30.80%-0.50%12.45%-7.46%13.43%-19.41%13.50%-16.87%28.91%
NORW
Global X MSCI Norway ETF
26.31%32.59%-2.50%5.03%-12.55%13.65%26.00%14.39%-10.39%24.03%

Correlation

The correlation between PTEU and NORW is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.51

The correlation between PTEU and NORW shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.53 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PTEU vs. NORW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PTEU
NORW

Financial Services

25.1%
22.6%

Industrials

20.9%
13.3%

Technology

14.6%
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
0.2%

Utilities

7.1%
0.7%

Healthcare

5.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
12.5%

Basic Materials

4.2%
10.9%

Energy

4.0%
29.4%

Communication Services

3.6%
5.9%

Real Estate

1.2%
0.4%

Financial Services

PTEU
25.1%
NORW
22.6%

Industrials

PTEU
20.9%
NORW
13.3%

Technology

PTEU
14.6%
NORW
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

PTEU
8.5%
NORW
0.2%

Utilities

PTEU
7.1%
NORW
0.7%

Healthcare

PTEU
5.7%
NORW

-

Consumer Defensive

PTEU
5.1%
NORW
12.5%

Basic Materials

PTEU
4.2%
NORW
10.9%

Energy

PTEU
4.0%
NORW
29.4%

Communication Services

PTEU
3.6%
NORW
5.9%

Real Estate

PTEU
1.2%
NORW
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTEU vs. NORW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTEU
PTEU Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
PTEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTEU Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
PTEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTEU Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

NORW
NORW Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
NORW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NORW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
NORW Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
NORW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NORW Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTEU vs. NORW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot European Index ETF (PTEU) and Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PTEUNORWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.37

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

3.95

-2.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.96

11.27

-6.31

PTEU vs. NORW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTEU Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the NORW Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTEU and NORW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PTEUNORWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

2.18

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.37

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.46

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.40

-0.11

Drawdowns

PTEU vs. NORW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTEU drawdown since its inception was -35.45%, roughly equal to the maximum NORW drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTEU and NORW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTEUNORWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.45%

-35.62%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.82%

-9.18%

-3.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.04%

-16.06%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.04%

-32.78%

+17.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.45%

-33.86%

-1.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.71%

-3.53%

+1.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.50%

-10.13%

-4.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.69%

3.21%

+0.48%

Volatility

PTEU vs. NORW - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Trendpilot European Index ETF (PTEU) has a higher volatility of 6.12% compared to Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW) at 4.06%. This indicates that PTEU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NORW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTEUNORWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.12%

4.06%

+2.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.00%

12.73%

+1.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.85%

16.70%

+0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.23%

21.88%

-6.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.58%

20.80%

-6.22%

PTEU vs. NORW - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTEU has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than NORW's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

PTEU vs. NORW - Dividend Comparison

PTEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, less than NORW's 2.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NORW
Global X MSCI Norway ETF
2.72%3.44%6.02%5.27%4.01%1.51%1.13%2.47%3.53%3.64%3.79%2.95%
PTEU
Pacer Trendpilot European Index ETF
1.81%1.92%3.49%2.74%0.69%1.55%0.00%3.43%1.86%0.60%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PTEU and NORW have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTEU has higher volatility (6.12%) compared to NORW (4.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTEU dropped -35.45% vs NORW's -35.62%.

On 10-year performance, NORW leads with 9.61% vs 4.25% for PTEU. On fees, NORW is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, NORW has been the lower-risk option at 4.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, NORW has performed better with a 9.61% return vs 4.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NORW is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for PTEU.

NORW has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 1.81% for PTEU.

PTEU tracks Pacer Trendpilot European Index, while NORW tracks MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for PTEU and 0.50% for NORW.

NORW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTEU and NORW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer