PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTEBX vs. DNLAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTEBX vs. DNLAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Opportunistic Municipal Securities Fund (PTEBX) and BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A (DNLAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTEBX achieves a 1.81% return, which is significantly lower than DNLAX's 27.67% return. Over the past 10 years, PTEBX has underperformed DNLAX with an annualized return of 2.06%, while DNLAX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.01% annualized return.


PTEBX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.55%
YTD
1.81%
6M
2.12%
1Y
7.39%
3Y*
3.96%
5Y*
0.74%
10Y*
2.06%

DNLAX

1D
1.81%
1M
2.80%
YTD
27.67%
6M
30.04%
1Y
54.19%
3Y*
16.78%
5Y*
16.23%
10Y*
14.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTEBX vs. DNLAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PTEBX
BNY Mellon Opportunistic Municipal Securities Fund
1.81%4.03%2.31%6.13%-10.18%1.53%5.02%8.51%0.51%5.75%
DNLAX
BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A
27.67%14.75%0.86%1.33%33.83%38.00%6.30%16.33%-17.78%13.69%

Correlation

The correlation between PTEBX and DNLAX is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2003

-0.10

The correlation between PTEBX and DNLAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (all time) to 0.02 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTEBX vs. DNLAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTEBX
PTEBX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
PTEBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTEBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTEBX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
PTEBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTEBX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

DNLAX
DNLAX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
DNLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
DNLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTEBX vs. DNLAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Opportunistic Municipal Securities Fund (PTEBX) and BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A (DNLAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PTEBXDNLAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.49

3.08

-0.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.97

3.93

+0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.51

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.69

7.45

-4.76

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.73

23.48

-13.76

PTEBX vs. DNLAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTEBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the DNLAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTEBX and DNLAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PTEBXDNLAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

3.08

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.64

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.55

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

0.37

+0.61

Drawdowns

PTEBX vs. DNLAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTEBX drawdown since its inception was -25.35%, smaller than the maximum DNLAX drawdown of -69.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTEBX and DNLAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTEBXDNLAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.35%

-69.14%

+43.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.70%

-7.51%

+4.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.36%

-32.37%

+26.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.08%

-32.37%

+17.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.08%

-54.45%

+39.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

0.00%

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.91%

-21.56%

+18.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.75%

2.38%

-1.63%

Volatility

PTEBX vs. DNLAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon Opportunistic Municipal Securities Fund (PTEBX) is 1.05%, while BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A (DNLAX) has a volatility of 4.59%. This indicates that PTEBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DNLAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTEBXDNLAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.05%

4.59%

-3.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.06%

13.48%

-11.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.87%

18.16%

-15.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.07%

25.65%

-21.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.06%

25.50%

-21.44%

PTEBX vs. DNLAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTEBX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than DNLAX's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

PTEBX vs. DNLAX - Dividend Comparison

PTEBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.46%, more than DNLAX's 1.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DNLAX
BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A
1.72%2.19%7.75%12.54%9.80%5.04%0.91%1.95%1.53%0.40%1.26%0.98%
PTEBX
BNY Mellon Opportunistic Municipal Securities Fund
3.46%4.47%3.20%2.31%2.34%2.27%2.75%3.25%2.94%2.98%3.13%3.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


PTEBX and DNLAX have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DNLAX has higher volatility (4.59%) compared to PTEBX (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTEBX dropped -25.35% vs DNLAX's -69.14%.

DNLAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.08 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTEBX and DNLAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer