PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTBD vs. AGG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTBD vs. AGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF (PTBD) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTBD achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly higher than AGG's 0.47% return.


PTBD

1D
0.10%
1M
0.29%
YTD
0.97%
6M
0.81%
1Y
3.88%
3Y*
5.02%
5Y*
-1.51%
10Y*

AGG

1D
0.03%
1M
0.14%
YTD
0.47%
6M
0.49%
1Y
5.29%
3Y*
4.02%
5Y*
0.23%
10Y*
1.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTBD vs. AGG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PTBD
Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF
0.97%2.49%4.24%8.84%-20.88%0.47%10.62%2.49%
AGG
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
0.47%7.19%1.31%5.65%-13.02%-1.77%7.48%0.27%

Correlation

The correlation between PTBD and AGG is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2019

0.56

The correlation between PTBD and AGG shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (all time) to 0.68 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTBD vs. AGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTBD
PTBD Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
PTBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTBD Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
PTBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTBD Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

AGG
AGG Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
AGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGG Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
AGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGG Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTBD vs. AGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF (PTBD) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PTBDAGGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.05

1.38

-0.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.52

2.06

-0.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.25

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.24

1.81

-0.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.69

5.61

-0.92

PTBD vs. AGG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTBD Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is comparable to the AGG Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTBD and AGG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PTBDAGGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

1.38

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.21

0.04

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.59

-0.48

Drawdowns

PTBD vs. AGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTBD drawdown since its inception was -26.00%, which is greater than AGG's maximum drawdown of -18.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTBD and AGG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTBDAGGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.00%

-18.43%

-7.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.12%

-2.76%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.82%

-6.11%

+2.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.00%

-17.82%

-8.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.89%

-1.93%

-6.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.16%

-2.71%

-7.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

0.89%

-0.07%

Volatility

PTBD vs. AGG - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF (PTBD) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) have volatilities of 1.30% and 1.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTBDAGGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.30%

1.32%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.88%

2.76%

+0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.72%

3.85%

-0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.25%

6.09%

+1.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.81%

5.41%

+2.40%

PTBD vs. AGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTBD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than AGG's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

PTBD vs. AGG - Dividend Comparison

PTBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.87%, more than AGG's 3.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGG
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
3.98%3.89%3.74%3.13%2.39%1.77%2.14%2.70%2.72%2.32%2.39%2.45%
PTBD
Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF
5.87%5.62%6.56%6.55%6.14%2.70%2.50%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PTBD and AGG have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGG has higher volatility (1.32%) compared to PTBD (1.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTBD dropped -26.00% vs AGG's -18.43%.

On 5-year performance, AGG leads with 0.23% vs -1.51% for PTBD. On fees, AGG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AGG has performed better with a 0.23% return vs -1.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AGG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTBD.

PTBD has the higher dividend yield at 5.87%, compared with 3.98% for AGG.

PTBD is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while AGG is Total Bond Market. PTBD tracks Pacer Trendpilot US Bond Index, while AGG tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTBD and 0.03% for AGG.

AGG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTBD and AGG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer