PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSWD vs. USNZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSWD vs. USNZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF (PSWD) and Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Equity ETF (USNZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSWD achieves a 26.31% return, which is significantly higher than USNZ's 9.83% return.


PSWD

1D
1.28%
1M
-1.30%
6M
26.74%
YTD
26.31%
1Y
20.73%
3Y*
17.15%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.24%

USNZ

1D
0.82%
1M
0.46%
6M
9.35%
YTD
9.83%
1Y
21.38%
3Y*
18.33%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$62.12K$66.88K$71.33K
$31.66K$19.08K$204.85K

PSWD vs. USNZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PSWD
Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF
26.31%1.69%9.46%18.58%
USNZ
Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Equity ETF
9.83%17.76%21.96%7.62%

Correlation

The correlation between PSWD and USNZ is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2023

0.64

The correlation between PSWD and USNZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.64 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PSWD vs. USNZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSWD
USNZ

Technology

98.1%
44.7%

Industrials

1.1%
3.4%

Real Estate

0.4%
3.0%

Communication Services

0.1%
11.7%

Financial Services

0.1%
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

0.1%
9.8%

Healthcare

0.1%
11.5%

Consumer Defensive

0.0%
3.2%

Energy

0.0%
0.0%

Utilities

0.0%
1.1%

Basic Materials

0.0%
1.2%

Technology

PSWD
98.1%
USNZ
44.7%

Industrials

PSWD
1.1%
USNZ
3.4%

Real Estate

PSWD
0.4%
USNZ
3.0%

Communication Services

PSWD
0.1%
USNZ
11.7%

Financial Services

PSWD
0.1%
USNZ
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

PSWD
0.1%
USNZ
9.8%

Healthcare

PSWD
0.1%
USNZ
11.5%

Consumer Defensive

PSWD
0.0%
USNZ
3.2%

Energy

PSWD
0.0%
USNZ
0.0%

Utilities

PSWD
0.0%
USNZ
1.1%

Basic Materials

PSWD
0.0%
USNZ
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSWD vs. USNZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PSWD
PSWD Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
PSWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSWD Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
PSWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSWD Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

USNZ
USNZ Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
USNZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USNZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
USNZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
USNZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
USNZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PSWD vs. USNZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF (PSWD) and Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Equity ETF (USNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PSWDUSNZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.25

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

1.81

-1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.78

7.42

-5.65

PSWD vs. USNZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSWD Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is lower than the USNZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSWD and USNZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PSWD vs. USNZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSWD drawdown since its inception was -23.70%, which is greater than USNZ's maximum drawdown of -19.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSWD and USNZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSWDUSNZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.70%

-19.16%

-4.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.70%

-11.07%

-12.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.70%

-19.16%

-4.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.86%

-1.65%

-5.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.43%

-3.27%

-3.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.55%

2.70%

+7.85%

Volatility

PSWD vs. USNZ - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF (PSWD) has a higher volatility of 8.88% compared to Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Equity ETF (USNZ) at 3.95%. This indicates that PSWD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USNZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSWDUSNZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.88%

3.95%

+4.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.02%

11.34%

+11.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.31%

14.11%

+13.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.05%

16.60%

+7.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.05%

16.60%

+7.45%

PSWD vs. USNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSWD has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than USNZ's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PSWD vs. USNZ - Dividend Comparison

PSWD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than USNZ's 0.96% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
PSWD
Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF
0.62%0.88%1.49%0.55%0.00%
USNZ
Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Equity ETF
0.96%1.02%1.14%1.19%0.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSWD and USNZ have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSWD has higher volatility (8.88%) compared to USNZ (3.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSWD dropped -23.70% vs USNZ's -19.16%.

On 3-year performance, USNZ leads with 18.33% vs 17.15% for PSWD. On fees, USNZ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, USNZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, USNZ has performed better with a 18.33% return vs 17.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USNZ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for PSWD.

USNZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.62% for PSWD.

PSWD is categorized as Technology Equities, while USNZ is Large Cap Blend Equities. PSWD tracks Solactive Cyber Security ESG Screened Index, while USNZ tracks Solactive ISS ESG United States Net Zero Pathway Enhanced Index - Benchmark TR Net. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for PSWD and 0.10% for USNZ.

USNZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSWD and USNZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer