PSWD vs. ISCMF
PSWD (Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF) and ISCMF (iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSWD is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Cyber Security ESG Screened Index, while ISCMF is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PSWD returned 20.15%/yr vs 10.82%/yr for ISCMF. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. PSWD charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ISCMF.
Performance
PSWD vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSWD achieves a 31.18% return, which is significantly higher than ISCMF's 11.96% return.
PSWD
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- 14.42%
- 6M
- 29.52%
- YTD
- 31.18%
- 1Y
- 21.10%
- 3Y*
- 20.15%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISCMF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -8.88%
- 6M
- 11.96%
- YTD
- 11.96%
- 1Y
- 22.55%
- 3Y*
- 10.82%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSWD vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PSWD Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF | 31.18% | 1.69% | 9.46% | 18.58% |
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 11.96% | 19.65% | 3.13% | -1.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSWD and ISCMF is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2023 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSWD vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank
PSWD
ISCMF
PSWD vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF (PSWD) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSWD | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.84 | -0.68 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | 1.66 | -0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.01 | 6.41 | -4.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSWD vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSWD drawdown since its inception was -23.70%, smaller than the maximum ISCMF drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSWD and ISCMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSWD | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.70% | -25.42% | +1.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.70% | -13.68% | -10.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.70% | -13.68% | -10.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.27% | -13.68% | +10.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.42% | -13.31% | +6.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.52% | 3.53% | +6.99% |
Volatility
PSWD vs. ISCMF - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF (PSWD) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) have volatilities of 9.47% and 9.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSWD | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.47% | 9.30% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.11% | 18.12% | +4.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.98% | 19.58% | +7.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.06% | 14.82% | +9.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.06% | 14.82% | +9.24% |
PSWD vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSWD has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCMF's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PSWD vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison
PSWD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, while ISCMF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSWD Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF | 0.59% | 0.88% | 1.49% | 0.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSWD and ISCMF have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSWD has higher volatility (9.47%) compared to ISCMF (9.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSWD dropped -23.70% vs ISCMF's -25.42%.
On 3-year performance, PSWD leads with 20.15% vs 10.82% for ISCMF. On fees, ISCMF is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ISCMF has been the lower-risk option at 9.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PSWD has performed better with a 20.15% return vs 10.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISCMF is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for PSWD.
PSWD has the higher dividend yield at 0.59%, compared with 0.00% for ISCMF.
PSWD is categorized as Technology Equities, while ISCMF is Commodities. PSWD tracks Solactive Cyber Security ESG Screened Index, while ISCMF tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for PSWD and 0.19% for ISCMF.
ISCMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSWD and ISCMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer