PSWD vs. ISCMF
PSWD (Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF) and ISCMF (iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSWD is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Cyber Security ESG Screened Index, while ISCMF is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, PSWD returned 15.26% vs 37.85% for ISCMF. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. PSWD charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ISCMF.
Performance
PSWD vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PSWD having a 22.48% return and ISCMF slightly higher at 22.87%.
PSWD
- 1D
- -3.24%
- 1M
- 22.87%
- YTD
- 22.48%
- 6M
- 16.89%
- 1Y
- 15.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISCMF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- YTD
- 22.87%
- 6M
- 27.76%
- 1Y
- 37.85%
- 3Y*
- 15.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSWD vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PSWD Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF | 22.48% | 1.69% | 9.46% | 18.58% |
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 22.87% | 19.65% | 3.13% | -1.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSWD and ISCMF is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2023 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSWD vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank
PSWD
ISCMF
PSWD vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF (PSWD) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSWD | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 2.53 | -1.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.65 | 6.69 | -6.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.47 | 15.68 | -14.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSWD | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 | 2.05 | -1.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.45 | +0.32 |
Drawdowns
PSWD vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSWD drawdown since its inception was -23.70%, smaller than the maximum ISCMF drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSWD and ISCMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSWD | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.70% | -25.42% | +1.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.70% | -5.69% | -18.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.32% | -5.26% | +1.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.46% | -13.43% | +6.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.38% | 2.42% | +7.96% |
Volatility
PSWD vs. ISCMF - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF (PSWD) has a higher volatility of 11.00% compared to iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) at 7.14%. This indicates that PSWD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISCMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSWD | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.00% | 7.14% | +3.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.87% | 15.90% | +4.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.46% | 18.53% | +6.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.68% | 14.38% | +9.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.68% | 14.38% | +9.30% |
PSWD vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSWD has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCMF's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PSWD vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison
PSWD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, while ISCMF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSWD Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF | 0.72% | 0.88% | 1.49% | 0.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSWD and ISCMF have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSWD has higher volatility (11.00%) compared to ISCMF (7.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSWD dropped -23.70% vs ISCMF's -25.42%.
On 1-year performance, ISCMF leads with 37.85% vs 15.26% for PSWD. On fees, ISCMF is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ISCMF has been the lower-risk option at 7.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ISCMF has performed better with a 37.85% return vs 15.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISCMF is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for PSWD.
PSWD has the higher dividend yield at 0.72%, compared with 0.00% for ISCMF.
PSWD is categorized as Technology Equities, while ISCMF is Commodities. PSWD tracks Solactive Cyber Security ESG Screened Index, while ISCMF tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for PSWD and 0.19% for ISCMF.
ISCMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSWD and ISCMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer