PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PST vs. TBT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PST vs. TBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury (PST) and ProShares UltraShort 20+ Year Treasury (TBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PST achieves a 4.57% return, which is significantly higher than TBT's 3.12% return. Over the past 10 years, PST has outperformed TBT with an annualized return of 2.47%, while TBT has yielded a comparatively lower 2.10% annualized return.


PST

1D
0.51%
1M
0.80%
YTD
4.57%
6M
6.73%
1Y
1.08%
3Y*
5.59%
5Y*
9.21%
10Y*
2.47%

TBT

1D
0.76%
1M
-1.08%
YTD
3.12%
6M
7.77%
1Y
-2.58%
3Y*
10.56%
5Y*
15.44%
10Y*
2.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PST vs. TBT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PST
ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury
4.57%-4.42%12.27%3.17%38.55%4.01%-18.67%-11.03%1.72%-4.52%
TBT
ProShares UltraShort 20+ Year Treasury
3.12%-1.45%27.66%-2.42%93.29%2.86%-37.93%-22.90%4.98%-17.25%

Correlation

The correlation between PST and TBT is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2008

0.91

The correlation between PST and TBT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

PST vs. TBT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PST
TBT

Financial Services

69.6%
72.7%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

PST
69.6%
TBT
72.7%

Basic Materials

PST

-

TBT

-

Communication Services

PST

-

TBT

-

Consumer Cyclical

PST

-

TBT

-

Consumer Defensive

PST

-

TBT

-

Energy

PST

-

TBT

-

Healthcare

PST

-

TBT

-

Industrials

PST

-

TBT

-

Real Estate

PST

-

TBT

-

Technology

PST

-

TBT

-

Utilities

PST

-

TBT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PST vs. TBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PST
PST Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
PST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PST Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
PST Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
PST Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
PST Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

TBT
TBT Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
TBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBT Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
TBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBT Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PST vs. TBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury (PST) and ProShares UltraShort 20+ Year Treasury (TBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSTTBTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

0.99

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.15

-0.17

+0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.26

-0.35

+0.61

PST vs. TBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PST Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is higher than the TBT Sharpe Ratio of -0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PST and TBT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSTTBTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

-0.13

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.49

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

0.07

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.37

-0.33

-0.05

Drawdowns

PST vs. TBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PST drawdown since its inception was -79.25%, smaller than the maximum TBT drawdown of -94.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PST and TBT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSTTBTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.25%

-94.99%

+15.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.25%

-14.89%

+7.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.19%

-33.83%

+17.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.19%

-33.83%

+17.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.07%

-65.09%

+29.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-64.13%

-85.63%

+21.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-61.48%

-77.33%

+15.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.16%

7.50%

-3.34%

Volatility

PST vs. TBT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury (PST) is 3.19%, while ProShares UltraShort 20+ Year Treasury (TBT) has a volatility of 5.74%. This indicates that PST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSTTBTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.19%

5.74%

-2.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.75%

13.20%

-6.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.62%

19.76%

-10.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.60%

31.42%

-15.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.32%

28.79%

-15.47%

PST vs. TBT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PST has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TBT's 0.93% expense ratio.


Dividends

PST vs. TBT - Dividend Comparison

PST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, more than TBT's 2.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
PST
ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury
3.08%3.47%3.61%3.69%0.02%0.00%0.11%1.85%0.66%
TBT
ProShares UltraShort 20+ Year Treasury
2.89%3.21%4.64%4.98%0.42%0.00%0.32%2.12%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, PST and TBT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TBT has higher volatility (5.74%) compared to PST (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PST dropped -79.25% vs TBT's -94.99%.

On 10-year performance, PST leads with 2.47% vs 2.10% for TBT. On fees, TBT is cheaper at 0.93% per year. On volatility, PST has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PST has performed better with a 2.47% return vs 2.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TBT is cheaper with a 0.93% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for PST.

PST has the higher dividend yield at 3.08%, compared with 2.89% for TBT.

PST tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index, while TBT tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for PST and 0.93% for TBT.

PST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.11 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PST and TBT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer