PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PST vs. SQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PST vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury (PST) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PST achieves a 5.91% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -42.24% return. Over the past 10 years, PST has outperformed SQQQ with an annualized return of 2.84%, while SQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower -55.43% annualized return.


PST

1D
-0.64%
1M
1.21%
6M
6.18%
YTD
5.91%
1Y
2.93%
3Y*
5.16%
5Y*
10.42%
10Y*
2.84%

SQQQ

1D
-3.30%
1M
-1.98%
6M
-38.99%
YTD
-42.24%
1Y
-57.13%
3Y*
-52.32%
5Y*
-46.24%
10Y*
-55.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PST vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PST
ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury
5.91%-4.42%12.27%3.17%38.55%4.01%-18.67%-11.03%1.72%-4.52%
SQQQ
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ
-42.24%-53.05%-49.79%-73.61%82.40%-60.87%-86.40%-65.92%-20.83%-58.67%

Correlation

The correlation between PST and SQQQ is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010

-0.18

The correlation between PST and SQQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (all time) to 0.16 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PST vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PST
PST Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
PST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PST Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
PST Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
PST Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
PST Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

SQQQ
SQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
SQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
SQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
SQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
SQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PST vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury (PST) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PSTSQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

0.81

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.43

-0.94

+1.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.76

-1.73

+2.49

PST vs. SQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PST Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is higher than the SQQQ Sharpe Ratio of -1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PST and SQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PST vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PST drawdown since its inception was -79.25%, smaller than the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PST and SQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSTSQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.25%

-100.00%

+20.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.90%

-61.03%

+54.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.19%

-92.51%

+76.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.19%

-97.27%

+81.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.07%

-99.97%

+63.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-63.67%

-100.00%

+36.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-61.49%

-92.75%

+31.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.87%

32.98%

-29.11%

Volatility

PST vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury (PST) is 2.81%, while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a volatility of 24.18%. This indicates that PST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSTSQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.81%

24.18%

-21.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.18%

45.91%

-38.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.44%

55.61%

-46.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.59%

67.89%

-52.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.28%

66.57%

-53.29%

PST vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PST and SQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

PST vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison

PST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than SQQQ's 10.34% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PST
ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury
2.83%3.47%3.61%3.69%0.02%0.00%0.11%1.85%0.66%0.00%
SQQQ
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ
10.34%9.36%10.23%8.01%0.28%0.00%2.15%2.92%1.47%0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


PST and SQQQ have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SQQQ has higher volatility (24.18%) compared to PST (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PST dropped -79.25% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.

On 10-year performance, PST leads with 2.84% vs -55.43% for SQQQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, PST has been the lower-risk option at 2.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PST has performed better with a 2.84% return vs -55.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PST and SQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.34%, compared with 2.83% for PST.

PST is categorized as Inverse Bonds, while SQQQ is Leveraged Equities. PST tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index, while SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%).

PST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.31 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PST and SQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer