PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSP vs. XMMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSP vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSP achieves a -13.50% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 23.73% return. Over the past 10 years, PSP has underperformed XMMO with an annualized return of 7.53%, while XMMO has yielded a comparatively higher 19.73% annualized return.


PSP

1D
-4.75%
1M
-5.00%
YTD
-13.50%
6M
-10.48%
1Y
-7.74%
3Y*
10.19%
5Y*
-0.12%
10Y*
7.53%

XMMO

1D
0.62%
1M
6.87%
YTD
23.73%
6M
25.73%
1Y
36.97%
3Y*
32.10%
5Y*
16.69%
10Y*
19.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSP vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSP
Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF
-13.50%6.49%17.42%37.72%-37.37%27.30%12.47%35.73%-15.12%24.13%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
23.73%13.04%38.03%20.39%-16.02%16.69%29.17%36.78%6.12%37.18%

Correlation

The correlation between PSP and XMMO is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2006

0.73

The correlation between PSP and XMMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PSP vs. XMMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSP
XMMO

Financial Services

90.7%
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
0.5%

Industrials

3.2%
41.1%

Communication Services

1.0%
1.6%

Healthcare

0.5%
6.3%

Basic Materials

0.1%
7.2%

Technology

0.1%
16.7%

Consumer Cyclical

-

4.6%

Energy

-

7.7%

Real Estate

-

6.1%

Utilities

-

5.8%

Financial Services

PSP
90.7%
XMMO
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

PSP
5.4%
XMMO
0.5%

Industrials

PSP
3.2%
XMMO
41.1%

Communication Services

PSP
1.0%
XMMO
1.6%

Healthcare

PSP
0.5%
XMMO
6.3%

Basic Materials

PSP
0.1%
XMMO
7.2%

Technology

PSP
0.1%
XMMO
16.7%

Consumer Cyclical

PSP

-

XMMO
4.6%

Energy

PSP

-

XMMO
7.7%

Real Estate

PSP

-

XMMO
6.1%

Utilities

PSP

-

XMMO
5.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSP vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSP
PSP Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
PSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSP Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
PSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSP Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

XMMO
XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSP vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSPXMMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.35

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.35

4.45

-4.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.80

18.21

-19.01

PSP vs. XMMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSP Sharpe Ratio is -0.39, which is lower than the XMMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSP and XMMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSPXMMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.39

1.99

-2.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

0.78

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.89

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.58

-0.49

Drawdowns

PSP vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSP drawdown since its inception was -85.40%, which is greater than XMMO's maximum drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSP and XMMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSPXMMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.40%

-55.37%

-30.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.37%

-8.34%

-14.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.94%

-24.93%

+1.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.16%

-27.91%

-19.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.16%

-36.74%

-10.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.72%

0.00%

-17.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.69%

-9.45%

-21.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.67%

2.04%

+7.63%

Volatility

PSP vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) is 6.89%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a volatility of 7.82%. This indicates that PSP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSPXMMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.89%

7.82%

-0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.20%

15.54%

+0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.91%

18.71%

+1.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.79%

21.45%

+2.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.45%

22.27%

+0.18%

PSP vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSP has a 1.44% expense ratio, which is higher than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSP vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison

PSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.68%, more than XMMO's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSP
Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF
6.68%5.87%8.62%3.96%2.88%10.34%4.66%5.87%6.81%10.18%4.12%6.23%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.60%0.78%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSP and XMMO have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XMMO has higher volatility (7.82%) compared to PSP (6.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSP dropped -85.40% vs XMMO's -55.37%.

On 10-year performance, XMMO leads with 19.73% vs 7.53% for PSP. On fees, XMMO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, PSP has been the lower-risk option at 6.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 19.73% return vs 7.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XMMO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.44% for PSP.

PSP has the higher dividend yield at 6.68%, compared with 0.60% for XMMO.

PSP is categorized as Global Equities, while XMMO is Momentum. PSP tracks Red Rocks Global Listed Private Equity Index, while XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 1.44% for PSP and 0.35% for XMMO.

XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSP and XMMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer