PSP vs. XMMO
PSP (Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF) and XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSP is a Global Equities fund tracking the Red Rocks Global Listed Private Equity Index, while XMMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSP returned 7.53%/yr vs 19.73%/yr for XMMO. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSP charges 1.44%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XMMO.
Performance
PSP vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSP achieves a -13.50% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 23.73% return. Over the past 10 years, PSP has underperformed XMMO with an annualized return of 7.53%, while XMMO has yielded a comparatively higher 19.73% annualized return.
PSP
- 1D
- -4.75%
- 1M
- -5.00%
- YTD
- -13.50%
- 6M
- -10.48%
- 1Y
- -7.74%
- 3Y*
- 10.19%
- 5Y*
- -0.12%
- 10Y*
- 7.53%
XMMO
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 6.87%
- YTD
- 23.73%
- 6M
- 25.73%
- 1Y
- 36.97%
- 3Y*
- 32.10%
- 5Y*
- 16.69%
- 10Y*
- 19.73%
PSP vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSP Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF | -13.50% | 6.49% | 17.42% | 37.72% | -37.37% | 27.30% | 12.47% | 35.73% | -15.12% | 24.13% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 23.73% | 13.04% | 38.03% | 20.39% | -16.02% | 16.69% | 29.17% | 36.78% | 6.12% | 37.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSP and XMMO is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2006 | 0.73 |
The correlation between PSP and XMMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PSP vs. XMMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSP
XMMO
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
PSP
XMMO
Consumer Defensive
PSP
XMMO
Industrials
PSP
XMMO
Communication Services
PSP
XMMO
Healthcare
PSP
XMMO
Basic Materials
PSP
XMMO
Technology
PSP
XMMO
Consumer Cyclical
PSP
-
XMMO
Energy
PSP
-
XMMO
Real Estate
PSP
-
XMMO
Utilities
PSP
-
XMMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSP vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank
PSP
XMMO
PSP vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSP | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.35 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.35 | 4.45 | -4.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.80 | 18.21 | -19.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSP | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.39 | 1.99 | -2.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | 0.78 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | 0.89 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | 0.58 | -0.49 |
Drawdowns
PSP vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSP drawdown since its inception was -85.40%, which is greater than XMMO's maximum drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSP and XMMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSP | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.40% | -55.37% | -30.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.37% | -8.34% | -14.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.94% | -24.93% | +1.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.16% | -27.91% | -19.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.16% | -36.74% | -10.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.72% | 0.00% | -17.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.69% | -9.45% | -21.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.67% | 2.04% | +7.63% |
Volatility
PSP vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) is 6.89%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a volatility of 7.82%. This indicates that PSP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSP | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.89% | 7.82% | -0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.20% | 15.54% | +0.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.91% | 18.71% | +1.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.79% | 21.45% | +2.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.45% | 22.27% | +0.18% |
PSP vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSP has a 1.44% expense ratio, which is higher than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSP vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison
PSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.68%, more than XMMO's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSP Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF | 6.68% | 5.87% | 8.62% | 3.96% | 2.88% | 10.34% | 4.66% | 5.87% | 6.81% | 10.18% | 4.12% | 6.23% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 0.60% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.80% | 1.43% | 0.41% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSP and XMMO have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XMMO has higher volatility (7.82%) compared to PSP (6.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSP dropped -85.40% vs XMMO's -55.37%.
On 10-year performance, XMMO leads with 19.73% vs 7.53% for PSP. On fees, XMMO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, PSP has been the lower-risk option at 6.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 19.73% return vs 7.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XMMO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.44% for PSP.
PSP has the higher dividend yield at 6.68%, compared with 0.60% for XMMO.
PSP is categorized as Global Equities, while XMMO is Momentum. PSP tracks Red Rocks Global Listed Private Equity Index, while XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 1.44% for PSP and 0.35% for XMMO.
XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSP and XMMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer