PSP vs. SPGM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PSP (Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF) and SPGM (SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF) are both Global Equities funds - PSP tracks the Red Rocks Global Listed Private Equity Index while SPGM tracks the MSCI AC World IMI. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSP returned 7.53%/yr vs 12.95%/yr for SPGM. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSP charges 1.44%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPGM.

Performance

PSP vs. SPGM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) and SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSP achieves a -13.50% return, which is significantly lower than SPGM's 12.88% return. Over the past 10 years, PSP has underperformed SPGM with an annualized return of 7.53%, while SPGM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.95% annualized return.

PSP

• 1D: -4.75%
• 1M: -5.00%
• YTD: -13.50%
• 6M: -10.48%
• 1Y: -7.74%
• 3Y*: 10.19%
• 5Y*: -0.12%
• 10Y*: 7.53%

SPGM

• 1D: -0.87%
• 1M: 4.94%
• YTD: 12.88%
• 6M: 13.62%
• 1Y: 31.70%
• 3Y*: 21.46%
• 5Y*: 11.48%
• 10Y*: 12.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSP vs. SPGM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PSP Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF	-13.50%	6.49%	17.42%	37.72%	-37.37%	27.30%	12.47%	35.73%	-15.12%	24.13%
SPGM SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF	12.88%	23.62%	16.75%	21.34%	-17.53%	21.13%	15.28%	26.58%	-10.12%	23.26%

Correlation

The correlation between PSP and SPGM is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2012	0.73

The correlation between PSP and SPGM shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (all time) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PSP vs. SPGM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PSP	SPGM
Financial Services	90.7%	16.4%
Consumer Defensive	5.4%	4.8%
Industrials	3.2%	13.1%
Communication Services	1.0%	8.5%
Healthcare	0.5%	8.2%
Basic Materials	0.1%	3.9%
Technology	0.1%	27.4%
Consumer Cyclical	-	9.2%
Energy	-	4.5%
Real Estate	-	1.9%
Utilities	-	2.2%

Return for Risk

PSP vs. SPGM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSP

PSP Risk / Return Rank: 5
PSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
PSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
PSP Omega Ratio Rank: 5
PSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
PSP Martin Ratio Rank: 5

SPGM

SPGM Risk / Return Rank: 73
SPGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
SPGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
SPGM Omega Ratio Rank: 74
SPGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
SPGM Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSP vs. SPGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) and SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PSP	SPGM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.39	2.47	-2.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.41	3.39	-3.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	1.45	-0.50
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.35	3.35	-3.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.80	15.14	-15.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PSP vs. SPGM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSP Sharpe Ratio is -0.39, which is lower than the SPGM Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSP and SPGM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PSP	SPGM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.39	2.47	-2.86
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.01	0.72	-0.73
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.34	0.74	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.08	0.66	-0.58

Drawdowns

PSP vs. SPGM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSP drawdown since its inception was -85.40%, which is greater than SPGM's maximum drawdown of -33.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSP and SPGM.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSP	SPGM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.40%	-33.97%	-51.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.37%	-9.50%	-12.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.94%	-16.90%	-6.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.16%	-25.93%	-21.23%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.16%	-33.97%	-13.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.72%	-0.87%	-16.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.69%	-4.81%	-25.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.67%	2.10%	+7.57%

Volatility

PSP vs. SPGM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) has a higher volatility of 6.89% compared to SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) at 3.92%. This indicates that PSP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSP	SPGM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.89%	3.92%	+2.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.20%	10.35%	+5.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.91%	12.88%	+7.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.79%	16.03%	+7.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.45%	17.57%	+4.88%

PSP vs. SPGM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSP has a 1.44% expense ratio, which is higher than SPGM's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSP vs. SPGM - Dividend Comparison

PSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.68%, more than SPGM's 1.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PSP Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF	6.68%	5.87%	8.62%	3.96%	2.88%	10.34%	4.66%	5.87%	6.81%	10.18%	4.12%	6.23%
SPGM SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF	1.79%	1.89%	1.98%	2.09%	2.37%	1.94%	1.45%	2.46%	1.89%	2.29%	1.87%	3.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSP and SPGM in my portfolio?

PSP and SPGM have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PSP or SPGM?

PSP has higher volatility (6.89%) compared to SPGM (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSP dropped -85.40% vs SPGM's -33.97%.

Which ETF is better, PSP or SPGM?

On 10-year performance, SPGM leads with 12.95% vs 7.53% for PSP. On fees, SPGM is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPGM has been the lower-risk option at 3.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PSP or SPGM?

Over the 10-year period, SPGM has performed better with a 12.95% return vs 7.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSP or SPGM?

SPGM is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.44% for PSP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PSP or SPGM?

PSP has the higher dividend yield at 6.68%, compared with 1.79% for SPGM.

What is the main difference between PSP and SPGM?

PSP tracks Red Rocks Global Listed Private Equity Index, while SPGM tracks MSCI AC World IMI. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.44% for PSP and 0.09% for SPGM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.