PSP vs. SPGM
PSP (Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF) and SPGM (SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF) are both Global Equities funds - PSP tracks the Red Rocks Global Listed Private Equity Index while SPGM tracks the MSCI ACWI IMI Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSP returned 7.81%/yr vs 13.23%/yr for SPGM. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSP charges 1.44%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPGM.
Performance
PSP vs. SPGM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSP achieves a -16.28% return, which is significantly lower than SPGM's 10.79% return. Over the past 10 years, PSP has underperformed SPGM with an annualized return of 7.81%, while SPGM has yielded a comparatively higher 13.23% annualized return.
PSP
- 1D
- -2.66%
- 1M
- -7.59%
- YTD
- -16.28%
- 6M
- -16.44%
- 1Y
- -10.82%
- 3Y*
- 9.26%
- 5Y*
- -0.69%
- 10Y*
- 7.81%
SPGM
- 1D
- -1.85%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 10.79%
- 6M
- 9.88%
- 1Y
- 28.37%
- 3Y*
- 20.39%
- 5Y*
- 11.06%
- 10Y*
- 13.23%
PSP vs. SPGM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSP Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF | -16.28% | 6.49% | 17.42% | 37.72% | -37.37% | 27.30% | 12.47% | 35.73% | -15.12% | 24.13% |
SPGM SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF | 10.79% | 23.62% | 16.75% | 21.34% | -17.53% | 21.13% | 15.28% | 26.58% | -10.12% | 23.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSP and SPGM is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2012 | 0.73 |
The correlation between PSP and SPGM shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (all time) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PSP vs. SPGM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSP
SPGM
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
PSP
SPGM
Consumer Defensive
PSP
SPGM
Industrials
PSP
SPGM
Communication Services
PSP
SPGM
Healthcare
PSP
SPGM
Basic Materials
PSP
SPGM
Technology
PSP
SPGM
Consumer Cyclical
PSP
-
SPGM
Energy
PSP
-
SPGM
Real Estate
PSP
-
SPGM
Utilities
PSP
-
SPGM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSP vs. SPGM — Risk / Return Rank
PSP
SPGM
PSP vs. SPGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) and SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSP | SPGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.38 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | 3.00 | -3.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | 13.18 | -14.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSP vs. SPGM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSP drawdown since its inception was -85.40%, which is greater than SPGM's maximum drawdown of -33.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSP and SPGM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSP | SPGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.40% | -33.97% | -51.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.37% | -9.50% | -12.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.94% | -16.90% | -6.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.16% | -25.93% | -21.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.16% | -33.97% | -13.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.37% | -2.70% | -17.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.65% | -4.79% | -25.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.42% | 2.16% | +8.26% |
Volatility
PSP vs. SPGM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) has a higher volatility of 7.37% compared to SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) at 5.64%. This indicates that PSP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSP | SPGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.37% | 5.64% | +1.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.77% | 11.44% | +5.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.30% | 13.74% | +6.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.88% | 16.16% | +7.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.36% | 17.50% | +4.86% |
PSP vs. SPGM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSP has a 1.44% expense ratio, which is higher than SPGM's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSP vs. SPGM - Dividend Comparison
PSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.50%, more than SPGM's 1.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSP Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF | 6.50% | 5.87% | 8.62% | 3.96% | 2.88% | 10.34% | 4.66% | 5.87% | 6.81% | 10.18% | 4.12% | 6.23% |
SPGM SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF | 1.83% | 1.89% | 1.98% | 2.09% | 2.37% | 1.94% | 1.45% | 2.46% | 1.89% | 2.29% | 1.87% | 3.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSP and SPGM have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSP has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to SPGM (5.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSP dropped -85.40% vs SPGM's -33.97%.
On 10-year performance, SPGM leads with 13.23% vs 7.81% for PSP. On fees, SPGM is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPGM has been the lower-risk option at 5.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPGM has performed better with a 13.23% return vs 7.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPGM is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.44% for PSP.
PSP has the higher dividend yield at 6.50%, compared with 1.83% for SPGM.
PSP tracks Red Rocks Global Listed Private Equity Index, while SPGM tracks MSCI ACWI IMI Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.44% for PSP and 0.09% for SPGM.
SPGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSP and SPGM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer