PSP vs. QQQM
PSP (Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSP is a Global Equities fund tracking the Red Rocks Global Listed Private Equity Index, while QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PSP returned -0.12%/yr vs 18.07%/yr for QQQM. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSP charges 1.44%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.
Performance
PSP vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSP achieves a -13.50% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 21.39% return.
PSP
- 1D
- -4.75%
- 1M
- -5.00%
- YTD
- -13.50%
- 6M
- -10.48%
- 1Y
- -7.74%
- 3Y*
- 10.19%
- 5Y*
- -0.12%
- 10Y*
- 7.53%
QQQM
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 10.67%
- YTD
- 21.39%
- 6M
- 19.75%
- 1Y
- 41.98%
- 3Y*
- 28.89%
- 5Y*
- 18.07%
- 10Y*
- —
PSP vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSP Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF | -13.50% | 6.49% | 17.42% | 37.72% | -37.37% | 27.30% | 20.84% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 21.39% | 20.85% | 25.68% | 55.01% | -32.52% | 27.45% | 6.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSP and QQQM is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020 | 0.69 |
The correlation between PSP and QQQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
PSP vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSP
QQQM
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
PSP
QQQM
Consumer Defensive
PSP
QQQM
Industrials
PSP
QQQM
Communication Services
PSP
QQQM
Healthcare
PSP
QQQM
Basic Materials
PSP
QQQM
Technology
PSP
QQQM
Consumer Cyclical
PSP
-
QQQM
Energy
PSP
-
QQQM
Real Estate
PSP
-
QQQM
Utilities
PSP
-
QQQM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSP vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank
PSP
QQQM
PSP vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSP | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.45 | -0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.35 | 3.53 | -3.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.80 | 13.52 | -14.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSP | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.39 | 2.65 | -3.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | 0.82 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | 0.85 | -0.77 |
Drawdowns
PSP vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSP drawdown since its inception was -85.40%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSP and QQQM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSP | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.40% | -35.04% | -50.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.37% | -11.96% | -10.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.94% | -22.70% | -0.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.16% | -35.04% | -12.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.72% | -0.20% | -17.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.69% | -8.25% | -22.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.67% | 3.11% | +6.56% |
Volatility
PSP vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) has a higher volatility of 6.89% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 4.48%. This indicates that PSP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSP | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.89% | 4.48% | +2.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.20% | 12.05% | +4.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.91% | 15.91% | +4.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.79% | 22.24% | +1.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.45% | 22.12% | +0.33% |
PSP vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSP has a 1.44% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSP vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
PSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.68%, more than QQQM's 0.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSP Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF | 6.68% | 5.87% | 8.62% | 3.96% | 2.88% | 10.34% | 4.66% | 5.87% | 6.81% | 10.18% | 4.12% | 6.23% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSP and QQQM have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSP has higher volatility (6.89%) compared to QQQM (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSP dropped -85.40% vs QQQM's -35.04%.
On 5-year performance, QQQM leads with 18.07% vs -0.12% for PSP. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QQQM has been the lower-risk option at 4.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 18.07% return vs -0.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.44% for PSP.
PSP has the higher dividend yield at 6.68%, compared with 0.41% for QQQM.
PSP is categorized as Global Equities, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. PSP tracks Red Rocks Global Listed Private Equity Index, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 1.44% for PSP and 0.15% for QQQM.
QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSP and QQQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer