PSP vs. DBMF

Last updated Jun 7, 2026

PSP (Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF) and DBMF (iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSP is a Global Equities fund tracking the Red Rocks Global Listed Private Equity Index, while DBMF is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by iM Global Partners. PSP is passively managed, while DBMF is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PSP returned -0.12%/yr vs 7.93%/yr for DBMF. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PSP charges 1.44%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DBMF.

Performance

PSP vs. DBMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSP achieves a -13.49% return, which is significantly lower than DBMF's 9.70% return.

PSP

• 1D: -2.24%
• 1M: -6.86%
• YTD: -13.49%
• 6M: -11.71%
• 1Y: -9.37%
• 3Y*: 9.64%
• 5Y*: -0.12%
• 10Y*: 7.44%

DBMF

• 1D: -2.01%
• 1M: -0.10%
• YTD: 9.70%
• 6M: 11.78%
• 1Y: 28.17%
• 3Y*: 9.96%
• 5Y*: 7.93%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSP vs. DBMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
PSP Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF	-13.49%	6.49%	17.42%	37.72%	-37.37%	27.30%	12.47%	13.51%
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	9.70%	13.85%	7.24%	-8.94%	21.61%	11.49%	1.80%	10.67%

Correlation

The correlation between PSP and DBMF is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.17
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2019	0.12

The correlation between PSP and DBMF shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (5 years) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PSP vs. DBMF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PSP	DBMF
Financial Services	90.7%	12.5%
Consumer Defensive	5.4%	6.1%
Industrials	3.2%	8.4%
Communication Services	1.0%	8.6%
Healthcare	0.5%	12.7%
Basic Materials	0.1%	2.2%
Technology	0.1%	29.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	11.0%
Energy	-	3.9%
Real Estate	-	2.5%
Utilities	-	2.3%

Return for Risk

PSP vs. DBMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSP

PSP Risk / Return Rank: 5
PSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
PSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
PSP Omega Ratio Rank: 5
PSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
PSP Martin Ratio Rank: 5

DBMF

DBMF Risk / Return Rank: 78
DBMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
DBMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
DBMF Omega Ratio Rank: 82
DBMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
DBMF Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSP vs. DBMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PSP	DBMF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.41	2.26	-2.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.43	2.97	-3.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	1.48	-0.53
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.37	4.58	-4.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.84	16.82	-17.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PSP vs. DBMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSP Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is lower than the DBMF Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSP and DBMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PSP	DBMF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.41	2.26	-2.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.01	0.63	-0.64
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.33	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.08	0.74	-0.66

Drawdowns

PSP vs. DBMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSP drawdown since its inception was -85.40%, which is greater than DBMF's maximum drawdown of -20.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSP and DBMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSP	DBMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.40%	-20.39%	-65.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.37%	-6.10%	-16.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.94%	-15.60%	-7.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.16%	-20.39%	-26.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.16%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.72%	-2.42%	-15.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.69%	-6.58%	-24.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.79%	1.66%	+8.13%

Volatility

PSP vs. DBMF - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) has a higher volatility of 7.36% compared to iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) at 2.88%. This indicates that PSP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSP	DBMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.36%	2.88%	+4.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.44%	10.00%	+6.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.16%	12.35%	+7.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.82%	12.55%	+11.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.47%	12.43%	+10.04%

PSP vs. DBMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSP has a 1.44% expense ratio, which is higher than DBMF's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSP vs. DBMF - Dividend Comparison

PSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.68%, more than DBMF's 5.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	5.22%	5.91%	5.75%	2.91%	7.72%	10.38%	0.86%	9.35%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PSP Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF	6.68%	5.87%	8.62%	3.96%	2.88%	10.34%	4.66%	5.87%	6.81%	10.18%	4.12%	6.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSP and DBMF in my portfolio?

PSP and DBMF have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PSP or DBMF?

PSP has higher volatility (7.36%) compared to DBMF (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSP dropped -85.40% vs DBMF's -20.39%.

Which ETF is better, PSP or DBMF?

On 5-year performance, DBMF leads with 7.93% vs -0.12% for PSP. On fees, DBMF is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, DBMF has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PSP or DBMF?

Over the 5-year period, DBMF has performed better with a 7.93% return vs -0.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSP or DBMF?

DBMF is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.44% for PSP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PSP or DBMF?

PSP has the higher dividend yield at 6.68%, compared with 5.22% for DBMF.

What is the main difference between PSP and DBMF?

PSP is categorized as Global Equities, while DBMF is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iM Global Partners. Their fees differ too: 1.44% for PSP and 0.85% for DBMF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.