PSO vs. GHC
PSO (Pearson plc) and GHC (Graham Holdings Company) are both stocks. PSO operates in Publishing (Communication Services), while GHC operates in Education & Training Services (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, PSO returned 5.16%/yr vs 10.09%/yr for GHC. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PSO vs. GHC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSO achieves a 8.70% return, which is significantly higher than GHC's 4.89% return. Over the past 10 years, PSO has underperformed GHC with an annualized return of 5.16%, while GHC has yielded a comparatively higher 10.09% annualized return.
PSO
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- -1.32%
- YTD
- 8.70%
- 6M
- 8.09%
- 1Y
- 5.54%
- 3Y*
- 15.79%
- 5Y*
- 7.50%
- 10Y*
- 5.16%
GHC
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 3.97%
- YTD
- 4.89%
- 6M
- 3.78%
- 1Y
- 19.38%
- 3Y*
- 27.56%
- 5Y*
- 13.67%
- 10Y*
- 10.09%
PSO vs. GHC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSO Pearson plc | 8.70% | -11.20% | 34.16% | 12.00% | 37.70% | -6.13% | 13.24% | -27.76% | 24.26% | 4.53% |
GHC Graham Holdings Company | 4.89% | 26.98% | 26.32% | 16.56% | -3.02% | 19.25% | -15.32% | 0.57% | 15.78% | 10.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSO and GHC is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2000 | 0.28 |
Fundamentals
PSO:
$9.75B
GHC:
$7.60M
PSO:
£1.16
GHC:
$90.63
PSO:
9.74
GHC:
12.67
PSO:
0.38
GHC:
0.14
PSO:
1.05
GHC:
1.01
PSO:
2.02
GHC:
0.00
PSO:
£7.12B
GHC:
$3.75B
PSO:
£3.66B
GHC:
$1.10B
PSO:
£2.01B
GHC:
$722.08M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSO vs. GHC — Risk / Return Rank
PSO
GHC
PSO vs. GHC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pearson plc (PSO) and Graham Holdings Company (GHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSO | GHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.15 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.28 | 0.98 | -0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.64 | 2.58 | -1.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSO vs. GHC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSO drawdown since its inception was -74.78%, which is greater than GHC's maximum drawdown of -67.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSO and GHC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSO | GHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.78% | -67.54% | -7.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.64% | -19.78% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.73% | -19.78% | -10.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.60% | -20.52% | -15.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.32% | -62.55% | +4.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.33% | -3.47% | -8.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.52% | -19.29% | -17.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.67% | 7.54% | +1.13% |
Volatility
PSO vs. GHC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pearson plc (PSO) is 5.39%, while Graham Holdings Company (GHC) has a volatility of 6.51%. This indicates that PSO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GHC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSO | GHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.39% | 6.51% | -1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.05% | 16.58% | +2.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.26% | 26.83% | -3.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.43% | 26.11% | +2.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.96% | 28.29% | +3.67% |
Dividends
PSO vs. GHC - Dividend Comparison
PSO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, more than GHC's 0.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHC Graham Holdings Company | 0.64% | 0.66% | 0.79% | 0.95% | 1.05% | 0.96% | 1.09% | 0.87% | 0.83% | 0.91% | 0.95% | 89.61% |
PSO Pearson plc | 2.16% | 2.12% | 1.82% | 2.21% | 2.40% | 3.27% | 2.74% | 2.90% | 1.96% | 5.14% | 7.28% | 7.48% |
Financials
PSO vs. GHC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Pearson plc and Graham Holdings Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
PSO and GHC have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GHC has higher volatility (6.51%) compared to PSO (5.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSO dropped -74.78% vs GHC's -67.54%.
GHC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSO and GHC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer