GHC vs. AGM
GHC (Graham Holdings Company) and AGM (Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation) are both stocks. GHC operates in Education & Training Services (Consumer Defensive), while AGM operates in Credit Services (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, GHC returned 10.28%/yr vs 23.70%/yr for AGM. Their 0.27 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
GHC vs. AGM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GHC achieves a 10.09% return, which is significantly lower than AGM's 32.18% return. Over the past 10 years, GHC has underperformed AGM with an annualized return of 10.28%, while AGM has yielded a comparatively higher 23.70% annualized return.
GHC
- 1D
- -1.79%
- 1M
- 1.88%
- 6M
- 3.67%
- YTD
- 10.09%
- 1Y
- 31.65%
- 3Y*
- 28.39%
- 5Y*
- 13.65%
- 10Y*
- 10.28%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.01%
AGM
- 1D
- 3.31%
- 1M
- 13.27%
- 6M
- 37.07%
- YTD
- 32.18%
- 1Y
- 38.47%
- 3Y*
- 15.35%
- 5Y*
- 22.35%
- 10Y*
- 23.70%
- ALL TIME*
- 20.01%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $26.71M | $26.87M | $25.58M | |
| $24.63M | $23.30M | $21.71M |
GHC vs. AGM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHC Graham Holdings Company | 10.09% | 26.98% | 26.32% | 16.56% | -3.02% | 19.25% | -15.32% | 0.57% | 15.78% | 10.05% |
AGM Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation | 32.18% | -7.96% | 6.08% | 74.61% | -5.83% | 72.62% | -6.60% | 43.16% | -20.38% | 39.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between GHC and AGM is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 1995 | 0.27 |
The correlation between GHC and AGM shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.47 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GHC:
$5.22B
AGM:
$2.47B
GHC:
$164.24
AGM:
$24.02
GHC:
7.33
AGM:
9.48
GHC:
0.08
AGM:
0.70
GHC:
0.79
AGM:
1.49
GHC:
$5.04B
AGM:
$1.40B
GHC:
$1.44B
AGM:
$305.82M
GHC:
$683.94M
AGM:
$198.60M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GHC vs. AGM — Risk / Return Rank
GHC
AGM
GHC vs. AGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Graham Holdings Company (GHC) and Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GHC | AGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.23 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 1.16 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.65 | 2.24 | +1.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GHC vs. AGM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GHC drawdown since its inception was -67.54%, smaller than the maximum AGM drawdown of -94.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHC and AGM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GHC | AGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.54% | -94.63% | +27.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.78% | -31.94% | +12.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.78% | -32.54% | +12.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.78% | -32.54% | +12.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.55% | -53.30% | -9.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.47% | 0.00% | -2.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.24% | -27.75% | +8.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.41% | 16.51% | -9.10% |
Volatility
GHC vs. AGM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Graham Holdings Company (GHC) is 6.76%, while Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) has a volatility of 7.91%. This indicates that GHC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GHC | AGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.76% | 7.91% | -1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.09% | 25.67% | -8.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.73% | 31.05% | -4.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.21% | 30.00% | -3.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.34% | 34.49% | -6.15% |
Dividends
GHC vs. AGM - Dividend Comparison
GHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than AGM's 2.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGM Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation | 2.72% | 3.42% | 2.84% | 2.30% | 3.37% | 2.84% | 4.31% | 3.35% | 3.84% | 1.84% | 1.82% | 2.03% |
GHC Graham Holdings Company | 0.62% | 0.66% | 0.79% | 0.95% | 1.05% | 0.96% | 1.09% | 0.87% | 0.83% | 0.91% | 0.95% | 89.61% |
Financials
GHC vs. AGM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Graham Holdings Company and Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GHC vs. AGM - Profitability Comparison
GHC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Graham Holdings Company reported a gross profit of 367.77M and revenue of 1.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.0%.
AGM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 450.26M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
GHC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Graham Holdings Company reported an operating income of 83.63M and revenue of 1.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.6%.
AGM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 450.26M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
GHC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Graham Holdings Company reported a net income of 281.10M and revenue of 1.27B, resulting in a net margin of 22.1%.
AGM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation reported a net income of 58.88M and revenue of 450.26M, resulting in a net margin of 13.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GHC and AGM have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AGM has higher volatility (7.91%) compared to GHC (6.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GHC dropped -67.54% vs AGM's -94.63%.
AGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GHC and AGM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer