PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSMR vs. COWZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSMR vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF (PSMR) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSMR achieves a 7.68% return, which is significantly lower than COWZ's 8.18% return.


PSMR

1D
-0.15%
1M
1.54%
YTD
7.68%
6M
8.38%
1Y
14.83%
3Y*
11.71%
5Y*
8.52%
10Y*

COWZ

1D
-0.34%
1M
2.61%
YTD
8.18%
6M
9.03%
1Y
22.23%
3Y*
14.44%
5Y*
10.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSMR vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PSMR
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF
7.68%6.74%11.99%16.85%-4.11%7.37%
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
8.18%8.98%10.64%14.73%0.19%16.59%

Correlation

The correlation between PSMR and COWZ is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2021

0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between PSMR and COWZ has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PSMR vs. COWZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSMR
COWZ

Technology

33.1%
16.0%

Financial Services

12.3%

-

Communication Services

10.7%
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
11.7%

Healthcare

9.8%
21.8%

Industrials

8.7%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
10.9%

Energy

3.5%
16.9%

Utilities

2.5%

-

Real Estate

2.0%

-

Basic Materials

1.9%
3.7%

Technology

PSMR
33.1%
COWZ
16.0%

Financial Services

PSMR
12.3%
COWZ

-

Communication Services

PSMR
10.7%
COWZ
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

PSMR
10.1%
COWZ
11.7%

Healthcare

PSMR
9.8%
COWZ
21.8%

Industrials

PSMR
8.7%
COWZ
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

PSMR
5.4%
COWZ
10.9%

Energy

PSMR
3.5%
COWZ
16.9%

Utilities

PSMR
2.5%
COWZ

-

Real Estate

PSMR
2.0%
COWZ

-

Basic Materials

PSMR
1.9%
COWZ
3.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSMR vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSMR
PSMR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
PSMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSMR Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
PSMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSMR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

COWZ
COWZ Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
COWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
COWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
COWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
COWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSMR vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF (PSMR) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSMRCOWZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.96

1.36

+0.60

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

15.03

4.46

+10.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

73.58

12.19

+61.39

PSMR vs. COWZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSMR Sharpe Ratio is 4.23, which is higher than the COWZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSMR and COWZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSMRCOWZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.23

2.02

+2.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.01

0.60

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

0.65

+0.41

Drawdowns

PSMR vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSMR drawdown since its inception was -11.78%, smaller than the maximum COWZ drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSMR and COWZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSMRCOWZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.78%

-38.63%

+26.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.99%

-5.00%

+4.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.78%

-22.00%

+10.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.78%

-22.00%

+10.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-0.91%

+0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.67%

-4.81%

+3.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.20%

1.83%

-1.63%

Volatility

PSMR vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF (PSMR) is 0.71%, while Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) has a volatility of 2.56%. This indicates that PSMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSMRCOWZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.71%

2.56%

-1.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.48%

7.12%

-4.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.53%

11.13%

-7.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.48%

17.63%

-9.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.41%

19.93%

-11.52%

PSMR vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSMR has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSMR vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison

PSMR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
1.99%2.19%1.82%1.92%1.96%1.48%2.54%1.96%1.67%1.95%0.13%
PSMR
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSMR and COWZ have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COWZ has higher volatility (2.56%) compared to PSMR (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSMR dropped -11.78% vs COWZ's -38.63%.

On 5-year performance, COWZ leads with 10.57% vs 8.52% for PSMR. On fees, COWZ is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, PSMR has been the lower-risk option at 0.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, COWZ has performed better with a 10.57% return vs 8.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

COWZ is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for PSMR.

COWZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 0.00% for PSMR.

PSMR is categorized as Defined Outcome, while COWZ is Mid Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for PSMR and 0.49% for COWZ.

PSMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.23 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSMR and COWZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer