PSMR vs. COWZ
PSMR (Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF) and COWZ (Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSMR is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Pacer, while COWZ is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. PSMR is actively managed, while COWZ is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PSMR returned 8.52%/yr vs 10.57%/yr for COWZ. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSMR charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for COWZ.
Performance
PSMR vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSMR achieves a 7.68% return, which is significantly lower than COWZ's 8.18% return.
PSMR
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 1.54%
- YTD
- 7.68%
- 6M
- 8.38%
- 1Y
- 14.83%
- 3Y*
- 11.71%
- 5Y*
- 8.52%
- 10Y*
- —
COWZ
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 2.61%
- YTD
- 8.18%
- 6M
- 9.03%
- 1Y
- 22.23%
- 3Y*
- 14.44%
- 5Y*
- 10.57%
- 10Y*
- —
PSMR vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSMR Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF | 7.68% | 6.74% | 11.99% | 16.85% | -4.11% | 7.37% |
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 8.18% | 8.98% | 10.64% | 14.73% | 0.19% | 16.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSMR and COWZ is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2021 | 0.68 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PSMR and COWZ has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PSMR vs. COWZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSMR
COWZ
Technology
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
PSMR
COWZ
Financial Services
PSMR
COWZ
-
Communication Services
PSMR
COWZ
Consumer Cyclical
PSMR
COWZ
Healthcare
PSMR
COWZ
Industrials
PSMR
COWZ
Consumer Defensive
PSMR
COWZ
Energy
PSMR
COWZ
Utilities
PSMR
COWZ
-
Real Estate
PSMR
COWZ
-
Basic Materials
PSMR
COWZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSMR vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank
PSMR
COWZ
PSMR vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF (PSMR) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSMR | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.96 | 1.36 | +0.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 15.03 | 4.46 | +10.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 73.58 | 12.19 | +61.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSMR | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.23 | 2.02 | +2.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.01 | 0.60 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.05 | 0.65 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
PSMR vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSMR drawdown since its inception was -11.78%, smaller than the maximum COWZ drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSMR and COWZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSMR | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.78% | -38.63% | +26.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.99% | -5.00% | +4.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.78% | -22.00% | +10.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.78% | -22.00% | +10.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -0.91% | +0.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.67% | -4.81% | +3.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.20% | 1.83% | -1.63% |
Volatility
PSMR vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF (PSMR) is 0.71%, while Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) has a volatility of 2.56%. This indicates that PSMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSMR | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.71% | 2.56% | -1.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.48% | 7.12% | -4.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.53% | 11.13% | -7.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.48% | 17.63% | -9.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.41% | 19.93% | -11.52% |
PSMR vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSMR has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSMR vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison
PSMR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.99% | 2.19% | 1.82% | 1.92% | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.54% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.95% | 0.13% |
PSMR Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSMR and COWZ have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COWZ has higher volatility (2.56%) compared to PSMR (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSMR dropped -11.78% vs COWZ's -38.63%.
On 5-year performance, COWZ leads with 10.57% vs 8.52% for PSMR. On fees, COWZ is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, PSMR has been the lower-risk option at 0.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, COWZ has performed better with a 10.57% return vs 8.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COWZ is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for PSMR.
COWZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 0.00% for PSMR.
PSMR is categorized as Defined Outcome, while COWZ is Mid Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for PSMR and 0.49% for COWZ.
PSMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.23 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSMR and COWZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer