PSMO vs. COWZ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PSMO (Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF) and COWZ (Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSMO is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Pacer, while COWZ is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. PSMO is actively managed, while COWZ is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PSMO returned 11.84%/yr vs 12.38%/yr for COWZ. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSMO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for COWZ.

Performance

PSMO vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF (PSMO) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSMO achieves a 5.01% return, which is significantly higher than COWZ's 3.27% return.

PSMO

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: 0.05%
• YTD: 5.01%
• 6M: 4.46%
• 1Y: 13.37%
• 3Y*: 11.84%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COWZ

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: -3.72%
• YTD: 3.27%
• 6M: 2.69%
• 1Y: 15.76%
• 3Y*: 12.38%
• 5Y*: 9.90%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSMO vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PSMO Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF	5.01%	11.44%	9.44%	20.50%	-1.32%	2.88%
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF	3.27%	8.98%	10.64%	14.73%	0.19%	8.41%

Correlation

The correlation between PSMO and COWZ is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021	0.64

The correlation between PSMO and COWZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PSMO vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSMO

PSMO Risk / Return Rank: 78
PSMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
PSMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
PSMO Omega Ratio Rank: 82
PSMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
PSMO Martin Ratio Rank: 82

COWZ

COWZ Risk / Return Rank: 45
COWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
COWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
COWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 39
COWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
COWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSMO vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF (PSMO) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PSMO	COWZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.26	1.39	+0.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.33	2.05	+1.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.25	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.00	2.66	+0.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.09	7.92	+7.17

PSMO vs. COWZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSMO Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is higher than the COWZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSMO and COWZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PSMO vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSMO drawdown since its inception was -9.77%, smaller than the maximum COWZ drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSMO and COWZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSMO	COWZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.77%	-38.63%	+28.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.48%	-5.95%	+1.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.77%	-22.00%	+12.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.66%	-5.40%	+4.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.32%	-4.80%	+3.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.89%	2.00%	-1.11%

Volatility

PSMO vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF (PSMO) is 1.62%, while Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) has a volatility of 3.97%. This indicates that PSMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSMO	COWZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.62%	3.97%	-2.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.70%	7.53%	-2.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.99%	11.38%	-5.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.38%	17.64%	-9.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.38%	19.90%	-11.52%

PSMO vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSMO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSMO vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison

PSMO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF	2.00%	2.19%	1.82%	1.92%	1.96%	1.48%	2.54%	1.96%	1.67%	1.95%	0.13%
PSMO Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSMO and COWZ in my portfolio?

PSMO and COWZ have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PSMO or COWZ?

COWZ has higher volatility (3.97%) compared to PSMO (1.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSMO dropped -9.77% vs COWZ's -38.63%.

Which ETF is better, PSMO or COWZ?

On 3-year performance, COWZ leads with 12.38% vs 11.84% for PSMO. On fees, COWZ is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, PSMO has been the lower-risk option at 1.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PSMO or COWZ?

Over the 3-year period, COWZ has performed better with a 12.38% return vs 11.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSMO or COWZ?

COWZ is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PSMO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PSMO or COWZ?

COWZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 0.00% for PSMO.

What is the main difference between PSMO and COWZ?

PSMO is categorized as Options Trading, while COWZ is Mid Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PSMO and 0.49% for COWZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.