PSMO vs. INCO

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

PSMO (Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF) and INCO (Columbia India Consumer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSMO is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Pacer, while INCO is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the Indxx India Consumer Index. PSMO is actively managed, while INCO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PSMO returned 11.81%/yr vs 7.64%/yr for INCO. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PSMO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for INCO.

Performance

PSMO vs. INCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF (PSMO) and Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSMO achieves a 4.92% return, which is significantly higher than INCO's -8.49% return.

PSMO

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: -0.05%
• YTD: 4.92%
• 6M: 4.59%
• 1Y: 12.73%
• 3Y*: 11.81%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

INCO

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 2.61%
• YTD: -8.49%
• 6M: -7.75%
• 1Y: -7.35%
• 3Y*: 7.64%
• 5Y*: 6.82%
• 10Y*: 8.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSMO vs. INCO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PSMO Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF	4.92%	11.44%	9.44%	20.50%	-1.32%	2.88%
INCO Columbia India Consumer ETF	-8.49%	0.59%	12.70%	34.63%	-7.01%	0.59%

Correlation

The correlation between PSMO and INCO is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021	0.38

Return for Risk

PSMO vs. INCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSMO

PSMO Risk / Return Rank: 78
PSMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
PSMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
PSMO Omega Ratio Rank: 82
PSMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
PSMO Martin Ratio Rank: 82

INCO

INCO Risk / Return Rank: 5
INCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
INCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
INCO Omega Ratio Rank: 5
INCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
INCO Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSMO vs. INCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF (PSMO) and Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PSMO	INCO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.15	-0.43	+2.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.18	-0.53	+3.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	0.94	+0.48
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.85	-0.35	+3.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.35	-0.83	+15.17

PSMO vs. INCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSMO Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the INCO Sharpe Ratio of -0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSMO and INCO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PSMO vs. INCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSMO drawdown since its inception was -9.77%, smaller than the maximum INCO drawdown of -47.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSMO and INCO.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSMO	INCO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.77%	-47.69%	+37.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.48%	-21.37%	+16.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.77%	-29.98%	+20.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.98%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-47.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.75%	-22.07%	+21.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.32%	-10.62%	+9.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.89%	8.91%	-8.02%

Volatility

PSMO vs. INCO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF (PSMO) is 1.61%, while Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO) has a volatility of 5.21%. This indicates that PSMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSMO	INCO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.61%	5.21%	-3.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.68%	14.39%	-9.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.95%	17.04%	-11.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.38%	16.98%	-8.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.38%	20.30%	-11.92%

PSMO vs. INCO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSMO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than INCO's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSMO vs. INCO - Dividend Comparison

Neither PSMO nor INCO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
INCO Columbia India Consumer ETF	0.00%	0.00%	2.88%	3.81%	10.57%	6.25%	0.34%	0.28%	0.12%	0.05%	0.09%
PSMO Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSMO and INCO in my portfolio?

PSMO and INCO have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PSMO or INCO?

INCO has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to PSMO (1.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSMO dropped -9.77% vs INCO's -47.69%.

Which ETF is better, PSMO or INCO?

On 3-year performance, PSMO leads with 11.81% vs 7.64% for INCO. On fees, PSMO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PSMO has been the lower-risk option at 1.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PSMO or INCO?

Over the 3-year period, PSMO has performed better with a 11.81% return vs 7.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSMO or INCO?

PSMO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for INCO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PSMO or INCO?

PSMO and INCO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between PSMO and INCO?

PSMO is categorized as Options Trading, while INCO is Asia Pacific Equities. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Ameriprise Financial. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PSMO and 0.75% for INCO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.