PSMJ vs. NVDO
PSMJ (Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF) and NVDO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSMJ charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for NVDO.
Performance
PSMJ vs. NVDO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSMJ achieves a 4.54% return, which is significantly lower than NVDO's 21.85% return.
PSMJ
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 1.17%
- YTD
- 4.54%
- 6M
- 5.78%
- 1Y
- 16.12%
- 3Y*
- 13.98%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDO
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 16.94%
- YTD
- 21.85%
- 6M
- 31.84%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSMJ vs. NVDO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PSMJ Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF | 4.54% | 3.85% |
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF | 21.85% | 11.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSMJ and NVDO is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2025 | 0.55 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSMJ vs. NVDO — Risk / Return Rank
PSMJ
NVDO
PSMJ vs. NVDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF (PSMJ) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSMJ | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.83 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.33 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.60 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.33 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSMJ | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.18 | 1.45 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
PSMJ vs. NVDO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSMJ drawdown since its inception was -10.87%, smaller than the maximum NVDO drawdown of -16.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSMJ and NVDO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSMJ | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.87% | -16.25% | +5.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.23% | +0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.37% | -5.00% | +3.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.67% | — | — |
Volatility
PSMJ vs. NVDO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSMJ | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.41% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.89% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.76% | 31.88% | -26.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.96% | 31.88% | -22.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.96% | 31.88% | -22.92% |
PSMJ vs. NVDO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSMJ has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDO's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSMJ vs. NVDO - Dividend Comparison
PSMJ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.67%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF | 13.67% | 16.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSMJ Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSMJ and NVDO have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PSMJ is cheaper at 0.61% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PSMJ is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for NVDO.
NVDO has the higher dividend yield at 13.67%, compared with 0.00% for PSMJ.
They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for PSMJ and 0.77% for NVDO.
Find the right allocation for PSMJ and NVDO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer