PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSLV vs. XAGH.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSLV vs. XAGH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV) and iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XAGH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PSLV is traded in USD, while XAGH.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the XAGH.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSLV achieves a -0.89% return, which is significantly higher than XAGH.TO's -1.75% return.


PSLV

1D
0.90%
1M
-0.64%
YTD
-0.89%
6M
23.11%
1Y
102.24%
3Y*
42.33%
5Y*
18.65%
10Y*
14.02%

XAGH.TO

1D
0.01%
1M
-2.07%
YTD
-1.75%
6M
-0.16%
1Y
0.92%
3Y*
1.27%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSLV vs. XAGH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PSLV
Sprott Physical Silver Trust
-0.89%145.08%19.43%-1.94%2.74%-5.65%
XAGH.TO
iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
-1.75%10.29%-8.05%6.65%-17.14%-4.43%

Correlation

The correlation between PSLV and XAGH.TO is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2021

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSLV vs. XAGH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSLV
PSLV Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
PSLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
PSLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSLV Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

XAGH.TO
XAGH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
XAGH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAGH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAGH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
XAGH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAGH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSLV vs. XAGH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV) and iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XAGH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSLVXAGH.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.03

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

0.21

+2.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.58

0.52

+5.06

PSLV vs. XAGH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is higher than the XAGH.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSLV and XAGH.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSLVXAGH.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

0.14

+1.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

-0.46

+0.63

Drawdowns

PSLV vs. XAGH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSLV drawdown since its inception was -79.38%, which is greater than XAGH.TO's maximum drawdown of -25.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSLV and XAGH.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSLVXAGH.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.38%

-25.54%

-53.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.65%

-4.42%

-36.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.65%

-11.24%

-29.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.53%

-15.85%

-19.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.15%

-17.37%

-40.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.38%

1.78%

+16.60%

Volatility

PSLV vs. XAGH.TO - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV) has a higher volatility of 16.60% compared to iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XAGH.TO) at 2.09%. This indicates that PSLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XAGH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSLVXAGH.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.60%

2.09%

+14.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.34%

4.78%

+52.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.49%

6.89%

+51.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.64%

11.98%

+23.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.14%

11.98%

+19.16%

PSLV vs. XAGH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSLV has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than XAGH.TO's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSLV vs. XAGH.TO - Dividend Comparison

PSLV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XAGH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
PSLV
Sprott Physical Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XAGH.TO
iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
4.00%3.78%3.51%3.05%1.91%0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSLV and XAGH.TO have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XAGH.TO is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XAGH.TO is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for PSLV.

PSLV is categorized as Silver, while XAGH.TO is Total Bond Market. PSLV tracks No Index (Physical Silver), while XAGH.TO tracks Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index (CAD-Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Sprott and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for PSLV and 0.18% for XAGH.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSLV and XAGH.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer