PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSLV.TO vs. ^TNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PSLV.TO vs. ^TNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV.TO) and Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PSLV.TO vs. ^TNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PSLV.TO
Sprott Physical Silver Trust
4.37%134.39%29.63%-4.04%9.85%-14.35%39.25%11.53%1.73%
^TNX
Treasury Yield 10 Years
5.06%-13.14%28.45%-2.53%174.83%63.40%-53.02%-32.07%4.65%
Different Trading Currencies

PSLV.TO is traded in CAD, while ^TNX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ^TNX values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSLV.TO achieves a 4.37% return, which is significantly lower than ^TNX's 5.06% return.


PSLV.TO

1D
-0.26%
1M
-16.80%
YTD
4.37%
6M
52.56%
1Y
105.39%
3Y*
44.48%
5Y*
24.68%
10Y*

^TNX

1D
0.05%
1M
8.43%
YTD
5.06%
6M
4.89%
1Y
0.97%
3Y*
8.32%
5Y*
23.30%
10Y*
9.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSLV.TO vs. ^TNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSLV.TO
PSLV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
PSLV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSLV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSLV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
PSLV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSLV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

^TNX
^TNX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
^TNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^TNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
^TNX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
^TNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
^TNX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSLV.TO vs. ^TNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV.TO) and Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSLV.TO^TNXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.94

0.05

+1.89

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.09

0.21

+1.88

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.02

+0.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

-0.12

+2.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.05

-0.20

+8.25

PSLV.TO vs. ^TNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSLV.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the ^TNX Sharpe Ratio of 0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSLV.TO and ^TNX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSLV.TO^TNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

0.05

+1.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.69

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.07

+0.48

Correlation

The correlation between PSLV.TO and ^TNX is -0.21. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Drawdowns

PSLV.TO vs. ^TNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSLV.TO drawdown since its inception was -41.53%, smaller than the maximum ^TNX drawdown of -84.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSLV.TO and ^TNX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PSLV.TO^TNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.53%

-93.78%

+52.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.47%

-13.99%

-25.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.47%

-31.74%

-7.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-84.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.25%

-46.17%

+14.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.36%

-51.38%

+36.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.77%

8.39%

+4.38%

Volatility

PSLV.TO vs. ^TNX - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV.TO) has a higher volatility of 17.94% compared to Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX) at 6.30%. This indicates that PSLV.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^TNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PSLV.TO^TNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.94%

6.30%

+11.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.40%

11.34%

+43.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.75%

19.20%

+35.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.56%

33.89%

-1.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.03%

48.45%

-11.42%