PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSLDX vs. PQTIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSLDX vs. PQTIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I (PSLDX) and PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class (PQTIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSLDX achieves a 10.00% return, which is significantly higher than PQTIX's 6.17% return. Over the past 10 years, PSLDX has outperformed PQTIX with an annualized return of 14.63%, while PQTIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.38% annualized return.


PSLDX

1D
0.21%
1M
5.66%
YTD
10.00%
6M
9.38%
1Y
34.01%
3Y*
19.48%
5Y*
5.94%
10Y*
14.63%

PQTIX

1D
0.35%
1M
1.34%
YTD
6.17%
6M
8.61%
1Y
20.36%
3Y*
0.65%
5Y*
3.67%
10Y*
4.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSLDX vs. PQTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSLDX
PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I
10.00%20.34%15.41%27.93%-43.18%25.85%37.80%60.43%-9.31%33.07%
PQTIX
PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class
6.17%2.39%-2.88%-4.19%11.62%14.87%9.96%2.90%2.37%2.37%

Correlation

The correlation between PSLDX and PQTIX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.03

Over the past year, PSLDX and PQTIX have become more correlated (0.24) than their long-term average of 0.03, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSLDX vs. PQTIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSLDX
PSLDX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
PSLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
PSLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

PQTIX
PQTIX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
PQTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PQTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
PQTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
PQTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
PQTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSLDX vs. PQTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I (PSLDX) and PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class (PQTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSLDXPQTIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.07

2.46

-0.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.77

3.23

-0.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.46

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

4.57

-2.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.05

13.02

-2.97

PSLDX vs. PQTIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSLDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the PQTIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSLDX and PQTIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSLDXPQTIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

2.46

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.37

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.47

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.48

+0.19

Drawdowns

PSLDX vs. PQTIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSLDX drawdown since its inception was -55.25%, which is greater than PQTIX's maximum drawdown of -27.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSLDX and PQTIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSLDXPQTIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.25%

-27.65%

-27.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.70%

-4.63%

-9.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.03%

-18.59%

-5.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.32%

-27.65%

-21.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.32%

-27.65%

-21.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-11.12%

+11.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.65%

-9.27%

-1.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.38%

1.62%

+1.76%

Volatility

PSLDX vs. PQTIX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I (PSLDX) has a higher volatility of 5.38% compared to PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class (PQTIX) at 1.83%. This indicates that PSLDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PQTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSLDXPQTIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.38%

1.83%

+3.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.18%

6.63%

+6.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.37%

8.52%

+7.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.71%

9.90%

+12.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.32%

9.41%

+11.91%

PSLDX vs. PQTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSLDX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than PQTIX's 1.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSLDX vs. PQTIX - Dividend Comparison

PSLDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.46%, while PQTIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PQTIX
PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%14.83%2.47%5.65%2.55%0.39%0.25%0.00%8.06%
PSLDX
PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I
9.46%12.92%15.23%3.67%2.66%38.80%12.89%18.91%15.58%24.52%11.55%12.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSLDX and PQTIX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSLDX has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to PQTIX (1.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSLDX dropped -55.25% vs PQTIX's -27.65%.

PQTIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSLDX and PQTIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer