PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PQTIX vs. PQTPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PQTIX vs. PQTPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class (PQTIX) and PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund (PQTPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PQTIX having a 6.17% return and PQTPX slightly lower at 6.03%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PQTIX having a 4.38% annualized return and PQTPX not far behind at 4.26%.


PQTIX

1D
0.35%
1M
1.34%
YTD
6.17%
6M
8.61%
1Y
20.36%
3Y*
0.65%
5Y*
3.67%
10Y*
4.38%

PQTPX

1D
0.36%
1M
1.35%
YTD
6.03%
6M
8.48%
1Y
20.30%
3Y*
0.54%
5Y*
3.55%
10Y*
4.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PQTIX vs. PQTPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PQTIX
PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class
6.17%2.39%-2.88%-4.19%11.62%14.87%9.96%2.90%2.37%2.37%
PQTPX
PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund
6.03%2.41%-3.08%-4.21%11.37%14.83%9.72%2.83%2.30%2.21%

Correlation

The correlation between PQTIX and PQTPX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.99

The correlation between PQTIX and PQTPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PQTIX vs. PQTPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PQTIX
PQTIX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
PQTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PQTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
PQTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
PQTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
PQTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

PQTPX
PQTPX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
PQTPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PQTPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
PQTPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
PQTPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
PQTPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PQTIX vs. PQTPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class (PQTIX) and PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund (PQTPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PQTIXPQTPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.46

2.45

+0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.23

3.24

-0.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.46

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.57

4.49

+0.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.02

12.81

+0.21

PQTIX vs. PQTPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PQTIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the PQTPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PQTIX and PQTPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PQTIXPQTPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

2.45

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.36

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.46

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.47

+0.01

Drawdowns

PQTIX vs. PQTPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PQTIX drawdown since its inception was -27.65%, roughly equal to the maximum PQTPX drawdown of -27.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQTIX and PQTPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PQTIXPQTPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.65%

-27.86%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.63%

-4.66%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.59%

-18.69%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.65%

-27.86%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.65%

-27.86%

+0.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.12%

-11.52%

+0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.27%

-9.41%

+0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

1.63%

-0.01%

Volatility

PQTIX vs. PQTPX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class (PQTIX) and PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund (PQTPX) have volatilities of 1.83% and 1.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PQTIXPQTPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.83%

1.91%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.63%

6.65%

-0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.52%

8.47%

+0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.90%

9.90%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.41%

9.38%

+0.03%

PQTIX vs. PQTPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PQTIX has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is higher than PQTPX's 1.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

PQTIX vs. PQTPX - Dividend Comparison

Neither PQTIX nor PQTPX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PQTIX
PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%14.83%2.47%5.65%2.55%0.39%0.25%0.00%8.06%
PQTPX
PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%14.80%2.40%5.63%2.49%0.32%0.20%0.00%7.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, PQTIX and PQTPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PQTPX has higher volatility (1.91%) compared to PQTIX (1.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PQTIX dropped -27.65% vs PQTPX's -27.86%.

PQTIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PQTIX and PQTPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer