PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PQTIX vs. RSBT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PQTIX vs. RSBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class (PQTIX) and Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PQTIX achieves a 2.53% return, which is significantly lower than RSBT's 4.41% return.


PQTIX

1D
-0.92%
1M
-1.99%
6M
-0.72%
YTD
2.53%
1Y
15.86%
3Y*
0.34%
5Y*
2.71%
10Y*
3.76%
ALL TIME*
4.21%

RSBT

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.85%
6M
0.54%
YTD
4.41%
1Y
22.66%
3Y*
2.49%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-0.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$575.14K$784.75K$843.96K

PQTIX vs. RSBT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PQTIX
PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class
2.53%2.39%-2.88%-4.36%
RSBT
Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF
4.41%10.31%-2.90%-11.85%

Correlation

The correlation between PQTIX and RSBT is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2023

0.49

The correlation between PQTIX and RSBT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PQTIX vs. RSBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PQTIX
PQTIX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
PQTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PQTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
PQTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
PQTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
PQTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

RSBT
RSBT Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
RSBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSBT Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
RSBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSBT Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PQTIX vs. RSBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class (PQTIX) and Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PQTIXRSBTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.30

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

3.73

-0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.59

8.86

-1.27

PQTIX vs. RSBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PQTIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the RSBT Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PQTIX and RSBT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PQTIX vs. RSBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PQTIX drawdown since its inception was -27.65%, which is greater than RSBT's maximum drawdown of -23.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQTIX and RSBT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PQTIXRSBTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.65%

-23.60%

-4.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.63%

-6.03%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.59%

-18.98%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.17%

-5.65%

-8.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.31%

-12.22%

+2.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

2.53%

-0.67%

Volatility

PQTIX vs. RSBT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class (PQTIX) is 2.15%, while Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) has a volatility of 3.32%. This indicates that PQTIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PQTIXRSBTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.15%

3.32%

-1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.70%

10.24%

-3.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.72%

14.01%

-5.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.91%

13.75%

-3.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.31%

13.75%

-4.44%

PQTIX vs. RSBT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PQTIX has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is higher than RSBT's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

PQTIX vs. RSBT - Dividend Comparison

PQTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than RSBT's 3.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PQTIX
PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class
1.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%14.83%2.47%5.65%2.55%0.39%0.25%0.00%8.06%
RSBT
Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF
3.07%3.20%0.00%2.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PQTIX and RSBT have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSBT has higher volatility (3.32%) compared to PQTIX (2.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PQTIX dropped -27.65% vs RSBT's -23.60%.

PQTIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PQTIX and RSBT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer