PSL vs. SPHQ

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

PSL (Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF) and SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSL is a Momentum fund tracking the DWA Consumer Staples Technical Leaders Index, while SPHQ is a Quality Factor fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSL returned 8.05%/yr vs 14.58%/yr for SPHQ. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PSL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SPHQ.

Performance

PSL vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PSL having a 14.41% return and SPHQ slightly lower at 14.14%. Over the past 10 years, PSL has underperformed SPHQ with an annualized return of 8.05%, while SPHQ has yielded a comparatively higher 14.58% annualized return.

PSL

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -0.23%
• 6M: 4.39%
• YTD: 14.41%
• 1Y: 6.53%
• 3Y*: 10.58%
• 5Y*: 6.05%
• 10Y*: 8.05%
• ALL TIME*: 9.36%

SPHQ

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: -3.11%
• 6M: 8.93%
• YTD: 14.14%
• 1Y: 21.69%
• 3Y*: 19.92%
• 5Y*: 12.81%
• 10Y*: 14.58%
• ALL TIME*: 10.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PSL Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF	$139.56K	$200.24K	$192.10K
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF	$121.34M	$134.31M	$144.70M

PSL vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PSL Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF	14.41%	-3.47%	15.42%	12.32%	-7.76%	6.88%	18.15%	14.16%	0.92%	21.82%
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF	14.14%	13.25%	25.44%	24.83%	-15.76%	28.03%	17.36%	33.64%	-7.10%	19.10%

Correlation

The correlation between PSL and SPHQ is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.48
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.61
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2006	0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between PSL and SPHQ has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PSL vs. SPHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PSL	SPHQ
Consumer Defensive	86.4%	7.5%
Consumer Cyclical	10.6%	5.3%
Financial Services	1.9%	15.2%
Industrials	1.2%	17.7%
Basic Materials	-	2.5%
Communication Services	-	6.4%
Energy	-	1.0%
Healthcare	-	3.2%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	41.2%
Utilities	-	4.5%

Return for Risk

PSL vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PSL

PSL Risk / Return Rank: 20
PSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
PSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
PSL Omega Ratio Rank: 21
PSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
PSL Martin Ratio Rank: 18

SPHQ

SPHQ Risk / Return Rank: 65
SPHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
SPHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
SPHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 59
SPHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
SPHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PSL vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PSL	SPHQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.48	1.51	-1.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.75	2.17	-1.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.26	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.48	2.45	-1.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.05	8.64	-7.59

PSL vs. SPHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSL Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the SPHQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSL and SPHQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PSL vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSL drawdown since its inception was -41.58%, smaller than the maximum SPHQ drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSL and SPHQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSL	SPHQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.58%	-57.83%	+16.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.64%	-8.90%	-4.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.64%	-16.57%	+2.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.96%	-25.04%	+6.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.67%	-31.60%	-3.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.85%	-5.50%	+3.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.79%	-10.64%	+4.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.22%	2.52%	+3.70%

Volatility

PSL vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) have volatilities of 4.62% and 4.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSL	SPHQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.62%	4.77%	-0.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.82%	12.37%	-2.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.66%	14.51%	-0.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.16%	16.74%	-1.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.54%	17.98%	-1.44%

PSL vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSL vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison

PSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than SPHQ's 1.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PSL Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF	0.73%	0.93%	0.60%	1.37%	1.98%	1.24%	0.80%	0.47%	0.75%	0.34%	2.08%	1.18%
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF	1.10%	1.09%	1.15%	1.42%	1.85%	1.19%	1.55%	1.51%	1.85%	1.57%	1.67%	2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSL and SPHQ in my portfolio?

PSL and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PSL or SPHQ?

SPHQ has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to PSL (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSL dropped -41.58% vs SPHQ's -57.83%.

Which ETF is better, PSL or SPHQ?

On 10-year performance, SPHQ leads with 14.58% vs 8.05% for PSL. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, PSL has been the lower-risk option at 4.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PSL or SPHQ?

Over the 10-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 14.58% return vs 8.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSL or SPHQ?

SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PSL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PSL or SPHQ?

SPHQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.10%, compared with 0.73% for PSL.

What is the main difference between PSL and SPHQ?

PSL is categorized as Momentum, while SPHQ is Quality Factor. PSL tracks DWA Consumer Staples Technical Leaders Index, while SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PSL and 0.15% for SPHQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.