PSL vs. SPHQ
PSL (Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF) and SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSL is a Momentum fund tracking the DWA Consumer Staples Technical Leaders Index, while SPHQ is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSL returned 7.88%/yr vs 15.01%/yr for SPHQ. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SPHQ.
Performance
PSL vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSL achieves a 9.10% return, which is significantly lower than SPHQ's 15.48% return. Over the past 10 years, PSL has underperformed SPHQ with an annualized return of 7.88%, while SPHQ has yielded a comparatively higher 15.01% annualized return.
PSL
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -1.77%
- YTD
- 9.10%
- 6M
- 9.15%
- 1Y
- -1.02%
- 3Y*
- 9.29%
- 5Y*
- 3.68%
- 10Y*
- 7.88%
SPHQ
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 7.17%
- YTD
- 15.48%
- 6M
- 16.06%
- 1Y
- 23.22%
- 3Y*
- 22.41%
- 5Y*
- 14.54%
- 10Y*
- 15.01%
PSL vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSL Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF | 9.10% | -3.47% | 15.42% | 12.32% | -7.76% | 6.88% | 18.15% | 14.16% | 0.92% | 21.82% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 15.48% | 13.25% | 25.44% | 24.83% | -15.76% | 28.03% | 17.36% | 33.64% | -7.10% | 19.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSL and SPHQ is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2006 | 0.70 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PSL and SPHQ has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PSL vs. SPHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSL
SPHQ
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
PSL
SPHQ
Consumer Cyclical
PSL
SPHQ
Financial Services
PSL
SPHQ
Industrials
PSL
SPHQ
Basic Materials
PSL
-
SPHQ
Communication Services
PSL
-
SPHQ
Energy
PSL
-
SPHQ
Healthcare
PSL
-
SPHQ
Real Estate
PSL
-
SPHQ
-
Technology
PSL
-
SPHQ
Utilities
PSL
-
SPHQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSL vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank
PSL
SPHQ
PSL vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSL | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.32 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.08 | 2.62 | -2.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.17 | 11.17 | -11.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSL | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 | 1.85 | -1.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.89 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.84 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.53 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
PSL vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSL drawdown since its inception was -41.58%, smaller than the maximum SPHQ drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSL and SPHQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSL | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.58% | -57.83% | +16.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.64% | -8.90% | -4.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.64% | -16.57% | +2.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.35% | -25.04% | +2.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.67% | -31.60% | -3.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.41% | 0.00% | -6.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.82% | -10.70% | +4.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.09% | 2.08% | +4.01% |
Volatility
PSL vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL) is 3.29%, while Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) has a volatility of 3.49%. This indicates that PSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSL | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.29% | 3.49% | -0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.51% | 10.18% | -1.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.80% | 12.62% | +0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.15% | 16.45% | -1.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.50% | 17.86% | -1.36% |
PSL vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSL vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison
PSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than SPHQ's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSL Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF | 0.84% | 0.93% | 0.60% | 1.37% | 1.98% | 1.24% | 0.80% | 0.47% | 0.75% | 0.34% | 2.08% | 1.18% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 1.04% | 1.09% | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSL and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPHQ has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to PSL (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSL dropped -41.58% vs SPHQ's -57.83%.
On 10-year performance, SPHQ leads with 15.01% vs 7.88% for PSL. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, PSL has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 15.01% return vs 7.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PSL.
SPHQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.84% for PSL.
PSL is categorized as Momentum, while SPHQ is S&P 500. PSL tracks DWA Consumer Staples Technical Leaders Index, while SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PSL and 0.15% for SPHQ.
SPHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSL and SPHQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer