PSL vs. QQQM
PSL (Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSL is a Momentum fund tracking the DWA Consumer Staples Technical Leaders Index, while QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PSL returned 3.68%/yr vs 18.07%/yr for QQQM. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.
Performance
PSL vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSL achieves a 9.10% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 21.39% return.
PSL
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -1.77%
- YTD
- 9.10%
- 6M
- 9.15%
- 1Y
- -1.02%
- 3Y*
- 9.29%
- 5Y*
- 3.68%
- 10Y*
- 7.88%
QQQM
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 10.67%
- YTD
- 21.39%
- 6M
- 19.75%
- 1Y
- 41.98%
- 3Y*
- 28.89%
- 5Y*
- 18.07%
- 10Y*
- —
PSL vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSL Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF | 9.10% | -3.47% | 15.42% | 12.32% | -7.76% | 6.88% | 7.02% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 21.39% | 20.85% | 25.68% | 55.01% | -32.52% | 27.45% | 6.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSL and QQQM is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020 | 0.50 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PSL and QQQM has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PSL vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSL
QQQM
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
PSL
QQQM
Consumer Cyclical
PSL
QQQM
Financial Services
PSL
QQQM
Industrials
PSL
QQQM
Basic Materials
PSL
-
QQQM
Communication Services
PSL
-
QQQM
Energy
PSL
-
QQQM
Healthcare
PSL
-
QQQM
Real Estate
PSL
-
QQQM
Technology
PSL
-
QQQM
Utilities
PSL
-
QQQM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSL vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank
PSL
QQQM
PSL vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSL | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.45 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.08 | 3.53 | -3.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.17 | 13.52 | -13.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSL | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 | 2.65 | -2.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.82 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.85 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
PSL vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSL drawdown since its inception was -41.58%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSL and QQQM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSL | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.58% | -35.04% | -6.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.64% | -11.96% | -1.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.64% | -22.70% | +9.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.35% | -35.04% | +12.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.41% | -0.20% | -6.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.82% | -8.25% | +2.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.09% | 3.11% | +2.98% |
Volatility
PSL vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL) is 3.29%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that PSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSL | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.29% | 4.48% | -1.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.51% | 12.05% | -3.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.80% | 15.91% | -3.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.15% | 22.24% | -7.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.50% | 22.12% | -5.62% |
PSL vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSL vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
PSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, more than QQQM's 0.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSL Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF | 0.84% | 0.93% | 0.60% | 1.37% | 1.98% | 1.24% | 0.80% | 0.47% | 0.75% | 0.34% | 2.08% | 1.18% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSL and QQQM have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQM has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to PSL (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSL dropped -41.58% vs QQQM's -35.04%.
On 5-year performance, QQQM leads with 18.07% vs 3.68% for PSL. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, PSL has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 18.07% return vs 3.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PSL.
PSL has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.41% for QQQM.
PSL is categorized as Momentum, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. PSL tracks DWA Consumer Staples Technical Leaders Index, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PSL and 0.15% for QQQM.
QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSL and QQQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer