PSL vs. PBJ
PSL (Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF) and PBJ (Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSL is a Momentum fund tracking the DWA Consumer Staples Technical Leaders Index, while PBJ is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Dynamic Food & Beverage Intellidex Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSL returned 8.21%/yr vs 5.24%/yr for PBJ. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PSL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for PBJ.
Performance
PSL vs. PBJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSL achieves a 11.21% return, which is significantly higher than PBJ's 6.04% return. Over the past 10 years, PSL has outperformed PBJ with an annualized return of 8.21%, while PBJ has yielded a comparatively lower 5.24% annualized return.
PSL
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 11.21%
- 6M
- 9.38%
- 1Y
- 1.20%
- 3Y*
- 9.94%
- 5Y*
- 4.59%
- 10Y*
- 8.21%
PBJ
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -2.30%
- YTD
- 6.04%
- 6M
- 5.12%
- 1Y
- 0.57%
- 3Y*
- 2.70%
- 5Y*
- 3.74%
- 10Y*
- 5.24%
PSL vs. PBJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSL Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF | 11.21% | -3.47% | 15.42% | 12.32% | -7.76% | 6.88% | 18.15% | 14.16% | 0.92% | 21.82% |
PBJ Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF | 6.04% | -1.86% | 2.49% | 2.31% | 3.14% | 26.88% | 5.53% | 17.50% | -11.21% | 1.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSL and PBJ is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2006 | 0.82 |
The correlation between PSL and PBJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
PSL vs. PBJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSL
PBJ
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
PSL
PBJ
Consumer Cyclical
PSL
PBJ
Financial Services
PSL
PBJ
Industrials
PSL
PBJ
Basic Materials
PSL
-
PBJ
Communication Services
PSL
-
PBJ
-
Energy
PSL
-
PBJ
-
Healthcare
PSL
-
PBJ
-
Real Estate
PSL
-
PBJ
-
Technology
PSL
-
PBJ
-
Utilities
PSL
-
PBJ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSL vs. PBJ — Risk / Return Rank
PSL
PBJ
PSL vs. PBJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL) and Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSL | PBJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.02 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.09 | 0.05 | +0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.19 | 0.11 | +0.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSL vs. PBJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSL drawdown since its inception was -41.58%, which is greater than PBJ's maximum drawdown of -39.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSL and PBJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSL | PBJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.58% | -39.15% | -2.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.64% | -12.48% | -1.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.64% | -12.99% | -0.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.45% | -15.81% | -3.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.67% | -28.49% | -6.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.60% | -6.79% | +2.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.81% | -5.40% | -0.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.20% | 5.43% | +0.77% |
Volatility
PSL vs. PBJ - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL) and Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ) have volatilities of 4.44% and 4.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSL | PBJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.44% | 4.40% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.20% | 9.42% | -0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.11% | 12.70% | +0.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 13.77% | +1.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.51% | 15.13% | +1.38% |
PSL vs. PBJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than PBJ's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSL vs. PBJ - Dividend Comparison
PSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than PBJ's 1.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBJ Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF | 1.29% | 1.83% | 1.11% | 1.81% | 1.82% | 0.90% | 1.12% | 1.21% | 1.41% | 0.70% | 1.56% | 1.24% |
PSL Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF | 0.75% | 0.93% | 0.60% | 1.37% | 1.98% | 1.24% | 0.80% | 0.47% | 0.75% | 0.34% | 2.08% | 1.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSL and PBJ have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSL has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to PBJ (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSL dropped -41.58% vs PBJ's -39.15%.
On 10-year performance, PSL leads with 8.21% vs 5.24% for PBJ. On fees, PSL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PSL has performed better with a 8.21% return vs 5.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for PBJ.
PBJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.29%, compared with 0.75% for PSL.
PSL is categorized as Momentum, while PBJ is Consumer Staples Equities. PSL tracks DWA Consumer Staples Technical Leaders Index, while PBJ tracks Dynamic Food & Beverage Intellidex Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PSL and 0.63% for PBJ.
PSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.09 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSL and PBJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer