PSL vs. PBJ
PSL (Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF) and PBJ (Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSL is a Momentum fund tracking the DWA Consumer Staples Technical Leaders Index, while PBJ is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Dynamic Food & Beverage Intellidex Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSL returned 7.88%/yr vs 5.27%/yr for PBJ. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PSL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for PBJ.
Performance
PSL vs. PBJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSL achieves a 9.10% return, which is significantly higher than PBJ's 6.38% return. Over the past 10 years, PSL has outperformed PBJ with an annualized return of 7.88%, while PBJ has yielded a comparatively lower 5.27% annualized return.
PSL
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -1.77%
- YTD
- 9.10%
- 6M
- 9.15%
- 1Y
- -1.02%
- 3Y*
- 9.29%
- 5Y*
- 3.68%
- 10Y*
- 7.88%
PBJ
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -4.27%
- YTD
- 6.38%
- 6M
- 5.80%
- 1Y
- 0.42%
- 3Y*
- 2.79%
- 5Y*
- 3.14%
- 10Y*
- 5.27%
PSL vs. PBJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSL Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF | 9.10% | -3.47% | 15.42% | 12.32% | -7.76% | 6.88% | 18.15% | 14.16% | 0.92% | 21.82% |
PBJ Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF | 6.38% | -1.86% | 2.49% | 2.31% | 3.14% | 26.88% | 5.53% | 17.50% | -11.21% | 1.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSL and PBJ is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2006 | 0.81 |
The correlation between PSL and PBJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
PSL vs. PBJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSL
PBJ
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
PSL
PBJ
Consumer Cyclical
PSL
PBJ
Financial Services
PSL
PBJ
Industrials
PSL
PBJ
Basic Materials
PSL
-
PBJ
Communication Services
PSL
-
PBJ
-
Energy
PSL
-
PBJ
-
Healthcare
PSL
-
PBJ
-
Real Estate
PSL
-
PBJ
-
Technology
PSL
-
PBJ
-
Utilities
PSL
-
PBJ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSL vs. PBJ — Risk / Return Rank
PSL
PBJ
PSL vs. PBJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL) and Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSL | PBJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.02 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.08 | 0.03 | -0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.17 | 0.08 | -0.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSL | PBJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 | 0.03 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.23 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.35 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.46 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
PSL vs. PBJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSL drawdown since its inception was -41.58%, which is greater than PBJ's maximum drawdown of -39.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSL and PBJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSL | PBJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.58% | -39.15% | -2.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.64% | -12.48% | -1.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.64% | -12.99% | -0.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.35% | -15.81% | -6.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.67% | -28.49% | -6.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.41% | -6.48% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.82% | -5.39% | -0.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.09% | 5.22% | +0.87% |
Volatility
PSL vs. PBJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL) is 3.29%, while Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ) has a volatility of 3.74%. This indicates that PSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSL | PBJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.29% | 3.74% | -0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.51% | 8.80% | -0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.80% | 12.48% | +0.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.15% | 13.75% | +1.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.50% | 15.11% | +1.39% |
PSL vs. PBJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than PBJ's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSL vs. PBJ - Dividend Comparison
PSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than PBJ's 1.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBJ Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF | 1.58% | 1.83% | 1.11% | 1.81% | 1.82% | 0.90% | 1.12% | 1.21% | 1.41% | 0.70% | 1.56% | 1.24% |
PSL Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF | 0.84% | 0.93% | 0.60% | 1.37% | 1.98% | 1.24% | 0.80% | 0.47% | 0.75% | 0.34% | 2.08% | 1.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSL and PBJ have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PBJ has higher volatility (3.74%) compared to PSL (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSL dropped -41.58% vs PBJ's -39.15%.
On 10-year performance, PSL leads with 7.88% vs 5.27% for PBJ. On fees, PSL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PSL has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PSL has performed better with a 7.88% return vs 5.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for PBJ.
PBJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.84% for PSL.
PSL is categorized as Momentum, while PBJ is Consumer Staples Equities. PSL tracks DWA Consumer Staples Technical Leaders Index, while PBJ tracks Dynamic Food & Beverage Intellidex Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PSL and 0.63% for PBJ.
PBJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.03 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSL and PBJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer