PSL vs. MMTM
PSL (Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF) and MMTM (SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF) are both Momentum funds - PSL tracks the DWA Consumer Staples Technical Leaders Index while MMTM tracks the S&P 1500 Positive Momentum Tilt Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSL returned 7.88%/yr vs 15.00%/yr for MMTM. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for MMTM.
Performance
PSL vs. MMTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PSL having a 9.10% return and MMTM slightly higher at 9.16%. Over the past 10 years, PSL has underperformed MMTM with an annualized return of 7.88%, while MMTM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.00% annualized return.
PSL
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -1.77%
- YTD
- 9.10%
- 6M
- 9.15%
- 1Y
- -1.02%
- 3Y*
- 9.29%
- 5Y*
- 3.68%
- 10Y*
- 7.88%
MMTM
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- 2.46%
- YTD
- 9.16%
- 6M
- 9.58%
- 1Y
- 24.27%
- 3Y*
- 22.46%
- 5Y*
- 13.50%
- 10Y*
- 15.00%
PSL vs. MMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSL Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF | 9.10% | -3.47% | 15.42% | 12.32% | -7.76% | 6.88% | 18.15% | 14.16% | 0.92% | 21.82% |
MMTM SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF | 9.16% | 13.26% | 29.94% | 22.49% | -16.12% | 26.33% | 19.27% | 29.98% | -4.62% | 24.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSL and MMTM is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2012 | 0.54 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PSL and MMTM has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PSL vs. MMTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSL
MMTM
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
PSL
MMTM
Consumer Cyclical
PSL
MMTM
Financial Services
PSL
MMTM
Industrials
PSL
MMTM
Basic Materials
PSL
-
MMTM
Communication Services
PSL
-
MMTM
Energy
PSL
-
MMTM
Healthcare
PSL
-
MMTM
Real Estate
PSL
-
MMTM
Technology
PSL
-
MMTM
Utilities
PSL
-
MMTM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSL vs. MMTM — Risk / Return Rank
PSL
MMTM
PSL vs. MMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL) and SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSL | MMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.31 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.08 | 2.46 | -2.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.17 | 11.15 | -11.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSL | MMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 | 1.72 | -1.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.75 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.81 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.85 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
PSL vs. MMTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSL drawdown since its inception was -41.58%, which is greater than MMTM's maximum drawdown of -33.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSL and MMTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSL | MMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.58% | -33.85% | -7.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.64% | -9.89% | -3.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.64% | -22.08% | +8.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.35% | -23.72% | +1.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.67% | -33.85% | -0.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.41% | -1.48% | -4.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.82% | -4.20% | -1.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.09% | 2.18% | +3.91% |
Volatility
PSL vs. MMTM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL) has a higher volatility of 3.29% compared to SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) at 2.35%. This indicates that PSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSL | MMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.29% | 2.35% | +0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.51% | 10.73% | -2.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.80% | 14.19% | -1.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.15% | 18.20% | -3.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.50% | 18.65% | -2.15% |
PSL vs. MMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than MMTM's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSL vs. MMTM - Dividend Comparison
PSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, more than MMTM's 0.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMTM SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF | 0.78% | 0.86% | 0.83% | 1.16% | 1.67% | 0.95% | 1.14% | 1.55% | 1.64% | 1.52% | 1.98% | 1.68% |
PSL Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF | 0.84% | 0.93% | 0.60% | 1.37% | 1.98% | 1.24% | 0.80% | 0.47% | 0.75% | 0.34% | 2.08% | 1.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSL and MMTM have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSL has higher volatility (3.29%) compared to MMTM (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSL dropped -41.58% vs MMTM's -33.85%.
On 10-year performance, MMTM leads with 15.00% vs 7.88% for PSL. On fees, MMTM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, MMTM has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MMTM has performed better with a 15.00% return vs 7.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MMTM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PSL.
PSL has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.78% for MMTM.
PSL tracks DWA Consumer Staples Technical Leaders Index, while MMTM tracks S&P 1500 Positive Momentum Tilt Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PSL and 0.12% for MMTM.
MMTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSL and MMTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer