PSIL vs. HDGE
PSIL (AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF) and HDGE (AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSIL is a Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while HDGE is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, PSIL returned 9.55%/yr vs -5.06%/yr for HDGE. At a correlation of -0.42, they often move in opposite directions. PSIL charges 1.00%/yr vs 3.36%/yr for HDGE.
Performance
PSIL vs. HDGE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSIL achieves a 20.15% return, which is significantly higher than HDGE's 5.43% return.
PSIL
- 1D
- -2.57%
- 1M
- 1.88%
- YTD
- 20.15%
- 6M
- 23.74%
- 1Y
- 65.52%
- 3Y*
- 9.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HDGE
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- -2.09%
- YTD
- 5.43%
- 6M
- 5.59%
- 1Y
- -0.65%
- 3Y*
- -5.06%
- 5Y*
- -2.89%
- 10Y*
- -14.77%
PSIL vs. HDGE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSIL AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF | 20.15% | 74.55% | -19.50% | -25.12% | -67.24% | -41.98% |
HDGE AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF | 5.43% | 1.50% | -8.01% | -26.98% | 16.59% | -1.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSIL and HDGE is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2021 | -0.42 |
The correlation between PSIL and HDGE shifts across timeframes, from -0.42 (all time) to -0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PSIL vs. HDGE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSIL
HDGE
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
PSIL
HDGE
Basic Materials
PSIL
-
HDGE
Communication Services
PSIL
-
HDGE
Consumer Cyclical
PSIL
-
HDGE
Consumer Defensive
PSIL
-
HDGE
Energy
PSIL
-
HDGE
Financial Services
PSIL
-
HDGE
Industrials
PSIL
-
HDGE
Real Estate
PSIL
-
HDGE
Technology
PSIL
-
HDGE
Utilities
PSIL
-
HDGE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSIL vs. HDGE — Risk / Return Rank
PSIL
HDGE
PSIL vs. HDGE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF (PSIL) and AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSIL | HDGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.01 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.23 | -0.05 | +3.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.82 | -0.11 | +6.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSIL | HDGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | -0.04 | +1.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.42 | -0.67 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
PSIL vs. HDGE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSIL drawdown since its inception was -92.72%, roughly equal to the maximum HDGE drawdown of -93.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSIL and HDGE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSIL | HDGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.72% | -93.88% | +1.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.38% | -12.26% | -8.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.62% | -29.46% | -35.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -42.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -83.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -76.63% | -93.08% | +16.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -76.76% | -70.11% | -6.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.63% | 6.16% | +3.47% |
Volatility
PSIL vs. HDGE - Volatility Comparison
AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF (PSIL) has a higher volatility of 9.76% compared to AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) at 6.41%. This indicates that PSIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDGE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSIL | HDGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.76% | 6.41% | +3.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.89% | 12.81% | +15.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.80% | 18.33% | +23.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.15% | 24.18% | +38.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.15% | 23.56% | +39.59% |
PSIL vs. HDGE - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSIL has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than HDGE's 3.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSIL vs. HDGE - Dividend Comparison
PSIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.32%, more than HDGE's 3.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDGE AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF | 3.32% | 3.50% | 7.83% | 9.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.22% |
PSIL AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF | 8.32% | 10.95% | 1.49% | 0.24% | 2.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSIL and HDGE have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSIL has higher volatility (9.76%) compared to HDGE (6.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSIL dropped -92.72% vs HDGE's -93.88%.
On 3-year performance, PSIL leads with 9.55% vs -5.06% for HDGE. On fees, PSIL is cheaper at 1.00% per year. On volatility, HDGE has been the lower-risk option at 6.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PSIL has performed better with a 9.55% return vs -5.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSIL is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 3.36% for HDGE.
PSIL has the higher dividend yield at 8.32%, compared with 3.32% for HDGE.
PSIL is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while HDGE is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for PSIL and 3.36% for HDGE.
PSIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSIL and HDGE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer