PSIL vs. GERM
PSIL (AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF) and GERM (Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. PSIL is actively managed, while GERM is passively managed. Over the past year, PSIL returned 65.52% vs 0.00% for GERM. PSIL charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for GERM.
Performance
PSIL vs. GERM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PSIL
- 1D
- -2.57%
- 1M
- 1.88%
- YTD
- 20.15%
- 6M
- 23.74%
- 1Y
- 65.52%
- 3Y*
- 9.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GERM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 0.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSIL vs. GERM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PSIL AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF | 20.15% | 74.55% | 39.61% |
GERM Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSIL vs. GERM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSIL
GERM
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
PSIL
GERM
Basic Materials
PSIL
-
GERM
-
Communication Services
PSIL
-
GERM
-
Consumer Cyclical
PSIL
-
GERM
-
Consumer Defensive
PSIL
-
GERM
-
Energy
PSIL
-
GERM
-
Financial Services
PSIL
-
GERM
Industrials
PSIL
-
GERM
-
Real Estate
PSIL
-
GERM
-
Technology
PSIL
-
GERM
-
Utilities
PSIL
-
GERM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSIL vs. GERM — Risk / Return Rank
PSIL
GERM
PSIL vs. GERM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF (PSIL) and Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSIL | GERM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.23 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.82 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSIL | GERM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.42 | — | — |
Drawdowns
PSIL vs. GERM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSIL drawdown since its inception was -92.72%, which is greater than GERM's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSIL and GERM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSIL | GERM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.72% | 0.00% | -92.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.38% | 0.00% | -20.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -76.63% | 0.00% | -76.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -76.76% | 0.00% | -76.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.63% | 0.00% | +9.63% |
Volatility
PSIL vs. GERM - Volatility Comparison
AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF (PSIL) has a higher volatility of 9.76% compared to Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM) at 0.00%. This indicates that PSIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GERM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSIL | GERM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.76% | 0.00% | +9.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.89% | 0.00% | +27.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.80% | 0.00% | +41.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.15% | 0.00% | +63.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.15% | 0.00% | +63.15% |
PSIL vs. GERM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSIL has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than GERM's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSIL vs. GERM - Dividend Comparison
PSIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.32%, while GERM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GERM Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSIL AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF | 8.32% | 10.95% | 1.49% | 0.24% | 2.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSIL has higher volatility (9.76%) compared to GERM (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSIL dropped -92.72% vs GERM's 0.00%.
On 1-year performance, PSIL leads with 65.52% vs 0.00% for GERM. On fees, GERM is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, GERM has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PSIL has performed better with a 65.52% return vs 0.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GERM is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for PSIL.
PSIL has the higher dividend yield at 8.32%, compared with 0.00% for GERM.
They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for PSIL and 0.68% for GERM.
Find the right allocation for PSIL and GERM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer