PSI vs. XTL
PSI (Invesco Semiconductors ETF) and XTL (SPDR S&P Telecom ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSI is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Dynamic Semiconductors Intellidex Index, while XTL is a Communications Equities fund tracking the S&P Telecom Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSI returned 34.59%/yr vs 16.27%/yr for XTL. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSI charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XTL.
Performance
PSI vs. XTL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSI achieves a 112.90% return, which is significantly higher than XTL's 51.28% return. Over the past 10 years, PSI has outperformed XTL with an annualized return of 34.59%, while XTL has yielded a comparatively lower 16.27% annualized return.
PSI
- 1D
- 3.00%
- 1M
- 10.45%
- YTD
- 112.90%
- 6M
- 110.54%
- 1Y
- 198.40%
- 3Y*
- 55.80%
- 5Y*
- 32.57%
- 10Y*
- 34.59%
XTL
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 1.76%
- YTD
- 51.28%
- 6M
- 51.62%
- 1Y
- 116.17%
- 3Y*
- 46.01%
- 5Y*
- 18.76%
- 10Y*
- 16.27%
PSI vs. XTL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF | 112.90% | 36.32% | 17.17% | 49.06% | -34.43% | 46.55% | 56.75% | 52.49% | -11.55% | 40.16% |
XTL SPDR S&P Telecom ETF | 51.28% | 44.95% | 34.89% | -1.17% | -19.18% | 21.58% | 22.46% | 12.51% | -6.60% | 0.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSI and XTL is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2011 | 0.66 |
The correlation between PSI and XTL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
PSI vs. XTL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSI
XTL
Technology
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
PSI
XTL
Industrials
PSI
XTL
-
Basic Materials
PSI
-
XTL
-
Communication Services
PSI
-
XTL
Consumer Cyclical
PSI
-
XTL
-
Consumer Defensive
PSI
-
XTL
-
Energy
PSI
-
XTL
-
Financial Services
PSI
-
XTL
-
Healthcare
PSI
-
XTL
-
Real Estate
PSI
-
XTL
Utilities
PSI
-
XTL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSI vs. XTL — Risk / Return Rank
PSI
XTL
PSI vs. XTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) and SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSI | XTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 1.56 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 12.90 | 7.95 | +4.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 45.29 | 33.56 | +11.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSI vs. XTL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSI drawdown since its inception was -62.96%, which is greater than XTL's maximum drawdown of -37.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSI and XTL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSI | XTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.96% | -37.01% | -25.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.48% | -14.70% | -0.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.07% | -22.79% | -18.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.85% | -37.01% | -7.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.85% | -37.01% | -7.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -6.72% | +6.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.92% | -9.76% | -6.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.40% | 3.48% | +0.92% |
Volatility
PSI vs. XTL - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) has a higher volatility of 18.89% compared to SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL) at 11.43%. This indicates that PSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSI | XTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.89% | 11.43% | +7.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.67% | 24.28% | +9.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.58% | 30.13% | +10.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.44% | 25.34% | +13.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.42% | 23.66% | +11.76% |
PSI vs. XTL - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSI has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than XTL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSI vs. XTL - Dividend Comparison
PSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than XTL's 0.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF | 0.04% | 0.10% | 0.15% | 0.40% | 0.61% | 0.14% | 0.21% | 0.52% | 0.83% | 0.21% | 0.68% | 0.16% |
XTL SPDR S&P Telecom ETF | 0.86% | 1.05% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.74% | 1.25% | 0.88% | 0.92% | 1.90% | 2.08% | 1.11% | 1.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSI and XTL have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSI has higher volatility (18.89%) compared to XTL (11.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSI dropped -62.96% vs XTL's -37.01%.
On 10-year performance, PSI leads with 34.59% vs 16.27% for XTL. On fees, XTL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XTL has been the lower-risk option at 11.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PSI has performed better with a 34.59% return vs 16.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XTL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for PSI.
XTL has the higher dividend yield at 0.86%, compared with 0.04% for PSI.
PSI is categorized as Semiconductors, while XTL is Communications Equities. PSI tracks Dynamic Semiconductors Intellidex Index, while XTL tracks S&P Telecom Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for PSI and 0.35% for XTL.
PSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.92 vs 3.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSI and XTL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer