PSI vs. XMMO

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

PSI (Invesco Semiconductors ETF) and XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSI is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Dynamic Semiconductors Intellidex Index, while XMMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSI returned 30.54%/yr vs 18.17%/yr for XMMO. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PSI charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XMMO.

Performance

PSI vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSI achieves a 76.39% return, which is significantly higher than XMMO's 13.32% return. Over the past 10 years, PSI has outperformed XMMO with an annualized return of 30.54%, while XMMO has yielded a comparatively lower 18.17% annualized return.

PSI

• 1D: 1.93%
• 1M: -11.98%
• 6M: 45.93%
• YTD: 76.39%
• 1Y: 136.90%
• 3Y*: 44.83%
• 5Y*: 26.49%
• 10Y*: 30.54%
• ALL TIME*: 17.57%

XMMO

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: -4.13%
• 6M: 10.87%
• YTD: 13.32%
• 1Y: 22.21%
• 3Y*: 24.75%
• 5Y*: 13.53%
• 10Y*: 18.17%
• ALL TIME*: 12.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF	$73.94M	$63.66M	$74.26M
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF	$60.28M	$71.43M	$67.26M

PSI vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF	76.39%	36.32%	17.17%	49.06%	-34.43%	46.55%	56.75%	52.49%	-11.55%	40.16%
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF	13.32%	13.04%	38.03%	20.39%	-16.02%	16.69%	29.17%	36.78%	6.12%	37.18%

Correlation

The correlation between PSI and XMMO is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.72
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.72
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2005	0.74

The correlation between PSI and XMMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

PSI vs. XMMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PSI	XMMO
Technology	100.0%	12.9%
Industrials	1.6%	37.0%
Basic Materials	-	10.2%
Communication Services	-	1.7%
Consumer Cyclical	-	5.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.5%
Energy	-	8.4%
Financial Services	-	2.9%
Healthcare	-	8.1%
Real Estate	-	7.2%
Utilities	-	6.0%

Return for Risk

PSI vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PSI

PSI Risk / Return Rank: 90
PSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
PSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
PSI Omega Ratio Rank: 87
PSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
PSI Martin Ratio Rank: 93

XMMO

XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 44
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 40
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PSI vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PSI	XMMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.76	1.04	+1.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.94	1.53	+1.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.19	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.85	1.60	+2.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.24	6.64	+10.60

PSI vs. XMMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSI Sharpe Ratio is 2.76, which is higher than the XMMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSI and XMMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PSI vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSI drawdown since its inception was -62.96%, which is greater than XMMO's maximum drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSI and XMMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSI	XMMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.96%	-55.37%	-7.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.74%	-13.91%	-21.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-41.07%	-24.93%	-16.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.85%	-27.91%	-16.94%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.85%	-36.74%	-8.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.95%	-10.02%	-15.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.92%	-9.42%	-6.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.97%	3.35%	+4.62%

Volatility

PSI vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) has a higher volatility of 22.74% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) at 7.91%. This indicates that PSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSI	XMMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.74%	7.91%	+14.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.67%	18.48%	+25.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.08%	21.51%	+28.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.62%	21.87%	+18.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.57%	22.44%	+14.13%

PSI vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSI has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSI vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison

PSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than XMMO's 0.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF	0.03%	0.10%	0.15%	0.40%	0.61%	0.14%	0.21%	0.52%	0.83%	0.21%	0.68%	0.16%
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF	0.62%	0.78%	0.34%	0.80%	1.43%	0.41%	0.61%	0.60%	0.19%	0.21%	0.22%	0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSI and XMMO in my portfolio?

PSI and XMMO have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PSI or XMMO?

PSI has higher volatility (22.74%) compared to XMMO (7.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSI dropped -62.96% vs XMMO's -55.37%.

Which ETF is better, PSI or XMMO?

On 10-year performance, PSI leads with 30.54% vs 18.17% for XMMO. On fees, XMMO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XMMO has been the lower-risk option at 7.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PSI or XMMO?

Over the 10-year period, PSI has performed better with a 30.54% return vs 18.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSI or XMMO?

XMMO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for PSI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PSI or XMMO?

XMMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.03% for PSI.

What is the main difference between PSI and XMMO?

PSI is categorized as Semiconductors, while XMMO is Momentum. PSI tracks Dynamic Semiconductors Intellidex Index, while XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for PSI and 0.35% for XMMO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.