PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSI vs. NEAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSI vs. NEAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) and iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF (NEAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSI achieves a 82.08% return, which is significantly higher than NEAR's 0.98% return. Over the past 10 years, PSI has outperformed NEAR with an annualized return of 31.78%, while NEAR has yielded a comparatively lower 2.85% annualized return.


PSI

1D
0.24%
1M
-19.44%
6M
55.16%
YTD
82.08%
1Y
131.76%
3Y*
46.66%
5Y*
28.58%
10Y*
31.78%
ALL TIME*
17.78%

NEAR

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.25%
6M
0.97%
YTD
0.98%
1Y
3.62%
3Y*
5.46%
5Y*
3.91%
10Y*
2.85%
ALL TIME*
2.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSI vs. NEAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSI
Invesco Semiconductors ETF
82.08%36.32%17.17%49.06%-34.43%46.55%56.75%52.49%-11.55%40.16%
NEAR
iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF
0.98%5.90%5.09%7.42%0.41%0.32%1.39%3.55%1.71%1.41%

Correlation

The correlation between PSI and NEAR is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2013

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSI vs. NEAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSI
PSI Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
PSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSI Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
PSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSI Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

NEAR
NEAR Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
NEAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEAR Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
NEAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEAR Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSI vs. NEAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) and iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF (NEAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PSINEARDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.54

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.58

3.21

+2.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.50

14.56

+6.93

PSI vs. NEAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSI Sharpe Ratio is 2.84, which is comparable to the NEAR Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSI and NEAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PSI vs. NEAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSI drawdown since its inception was -62.96%, which is greater than NEAR's maximum drawdown of -9.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSI and NEAR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSINEARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.96%

-9.61%

-53.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.75%

-1.13%

-22.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.07%

-1.16%

-39.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.85%

-1.32%

-43.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.85%

-9.61%

-35.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.56%

-0.04%

-23.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.90%

-0.16%

-15.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.15%

0.25%

+5.90%

Volatility

PSI vs. NEAR - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) has a higher volatility of 23.74% compared to iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF (NEAR) at 0.33%. This indicates that PSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSINEARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.74%

0.33%

+23.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.37%

1.07%

+39.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.83%

1.37%

+45.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.82%

1.36%

+38.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.12%

2.50%

+33.62%

PSI vs. NEAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSI has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than NEAR's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSI vs. NEAR - Dividend Comparison

PSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than NEAR's 4.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NEAR
iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF
4.43%4.54%5.00%4.59%1.78%0.76%1.53%2.69%2.25%1.52%1.07%0.85%
PSI
Invesco Semiconductors ETF
0.03%0.10%0.15%0.40%0.61%0.14%0.21%0.52%0.83%0.21%0.68%0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSI and NEAR have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSI has higher volatility (23.74%) compared to NEAR (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSI dropped -62.96% vs NEAR's -9.61%.

On 10-year performance, PSI leads with 31.78% vs 2.85% for NEAR. On fees, NEAR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, NEAR has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PSI has performed better with a 31.78% return vs 2.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NEAR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for PSI.

NEAR has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 0.03% for PSI.

PSI is categorized as Semiconductors, while NEAR is Short-Term Bond. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for PSI and 0.25% for NEAR.

PSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 2.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSI and NEAR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer