PSFM vs. AIOO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PSFM (Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF) and AIOO (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSFM charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for AIOO.

Performance

PSFM vs. AIOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF (PSFM) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF (AIOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSFM achieves a 9.21% return, which is significantly higher than AIOO's 2.34% return.

PSFM

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 1.92%
• YTD: 9.21%
• 6M: 10.00%
• 1Y: 17.37%
• 3Y*: 13.46%
• 5Y*: 10.00%
• 10Y*: —

AIOO

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 1.13%
• YTD: 2.34%
• 6M: 2.33%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSFM vs. AIOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PSFM Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF	9.21%	5.52%
AIOO AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF	2.34%	2.67%

Correlation

The correlation between PSFM and AIOO is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2025	0.65

Return for Risk

PSFM vs. AIOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSFM

PSFM Risk / Return Rank: 98
PSFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
PSFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
PSFM Omega Ratio Rank: 98
PSFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
PSFM Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSFM vs. AIOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF (PSFM) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF (AIOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PSFM	AIOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.37	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	7.81	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.03	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	13.28	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	70.48	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PSFM	AIOO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.37	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.00	2.79	-1.78

Drawdowns

PSFM vs. AIOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSFM drawdown since its inception was -14.33%, which is greater than AIOO's maximum drawdown of -0.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSFM and AIOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSFM	AIOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.33%	-0.74%	-13.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.31%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.12%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.33%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.16%	-0.13%	-0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.27%	-0.17%	-2.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.25%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PSFM	AIOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.86%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.88%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.01%	1.99%	+2.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.57%	1.99%	+8.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.51%	1.99%	+8.52%

PSFM vs. AIOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSFM has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than AIOO's 0.64% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSFM vs. AIOO - Dividend Comparison

Neither PSFM nor AIOO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSFM and AIOO in my portfolio?

PSFM and AIOO have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PSFM or AIOO?

On fees, PSFM is cheaper at 0.61% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSFM or AIOO?

PSFM is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for AIOO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PSFM or AIOO?

PSFM and AIOO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between PSFM and AIOO?

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Allianz. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for PSFM and 0.64% for AIOO.