PSFD vs. FTIF

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

PSFD (Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF) and FTIF (First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. PSFD is actively managed, while FTIF is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PSFD returned 15.00%/yr vs 15.94%/yr for FTIF. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSFD charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTIF.

Performance

PSFD vs. FTIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF (PSFD) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSFD achieves a 6.69% return, which is significantly lower than FTIF's 25.00% return.

PSFD

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.33%
• YTD: 6.69%
• 6M: 7.90%
• 1Y: 18.41%
• 3Y*: 15.00%
• 5Y*: 11.94%
• 10Y*: —

FTIF

• 1D: 1.41%
• 1M: -0.10%
• YTD: 25.00%
• 6M: 25.63%
• 1Y: 38.00%
• 3Y*: 15.94%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSFD vs. FTIF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PSFD Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF	6.69%	12.93%	14.54%	18.01%
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF	25.00%	7.79%	0.50%	12.52%

Correlation

The correlation between PSFD and FTIF is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2023	0.58

The correlation between PSFD and FTIF shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PSFD vs. FTIF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PSFD	FTIF
Technology	36.2%	4.1%
Financial Services	11.9%	-
Communication Services	10.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	3.2%
Healthcare	8.4%	-
Industrials	8.1%	16.5%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	-
Energy	3.5%	44.1%
Utilities	2.3%	-
Real Estate	1.9%	12.1%
Basic Materials	1.8%	20.1%

Return for Risk

PSFD vs. FTIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSFD

PSFD Risk / Return Rank: 80
PSFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
PSFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
PSFD Omega Ratio Rank: 88
PSFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
PSFD Martin Ratio Rank: 81

FTIF

FTIF Risk / Return Rank: 82
FTIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
FTIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
FTIF Omega Ratio Rank: 73
FTIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
FTIF Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSFD vs. FTIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF (PSFD) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PSFD	FTIF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.72	2.55	+0.18
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.01	3.50	+0.52
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	1.44	+0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.20	7.13	-3.92
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.43	21.16	-4.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PSFD vs. FTIF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSFD Sharpe Ratio is 2.72, which is comparable to the FTIF Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSFD and FTIF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PSFD	FTIF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.72	2.55	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.14	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.25	0.74	+0.51

Drawdowns

PSFD vs. FTIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSFD drawdown since its inception was -14.94%, smaller than the maximum FTIF drawdown of -27.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSFD and FTIF.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSFD	FTIF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.94%	-27.83%	+12.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.88%	-5.46%	-0.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.26%	-27.83%	+15.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.94%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.14%	+1.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.02%	-6.01%	+3.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.15%	1.84%	-0.69%

Volatility

PSFD vs. FTIF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF (PSFD) is 1.16%, while First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF) has a volatility of 4.00%. This indicates that PSFD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSFD	FTIF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.16%	4.00%	-2.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.61%	10.55%	-4.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.80%	15.00%	-8.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.48%	18.97%	-8.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.43%	18.97%	-8.54%

PSFD vs. FTIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSFD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FTIF's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSFD vs. FTIF - Dividend Comparison

PSFD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF	1.12%	1.45%	2.88%	1.55%
PSFD Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSFD and FTIF in my portfolio?

PSFD and FTIF have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PSFD or FTIF?

FTIF has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to PSFD (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSFD dropped -14.94% vs FTIF's -27.83%.

Which ETF is better, PSFD or FTIF?

On 3-year performance, FTIF leads with 15.94% vs 15.00% for PSFD. On fees, FTIF is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PSFD has been the lower-risk option at 1.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PSFD or FTIF?

Over the 3-year period, FTIF has performed better with a 15.94% return vs 15.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSFD or FTIF?

FTIF is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSFD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PSFD or FTIF?

FTIF has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.00% for PSFD.

What is the main difference between PSFD and FTIF?

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PSFD and 0.60% for FTIF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.