PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSF vs. PFFA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSF vs. PFFA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Select Preferred and Income Fund (PSF) and Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSF achieves a 0.45% return, which is significantly lower than PFFA's 1.89% return.


PSF

1D
0.10%
1M
-2.03%
6M
-1.20%
YTD
0.45%
1Y
2.31%
3Y*
9.10%
5Y*
-1.80%
10Y*
4.50%
ALL TIME*
6.89%

PFFA

1D
0.68%
1M
0.64%
6M
0.25%
YTD
1.89%
1Y
6.74%
3Y*
11.90%
5Y*
5.61%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$15.43M$17.09M$20.18M
$617.85K$606.44K$847.81K

PSF vs. PFFA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PSF
Cohen & Steers Select Preferred and Income Fund
0.45%10.63%12.84%9.88%-24.55%3.89%-3.78%42.60%-3.52%
PFFA
Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF
1.89%8.22%16.11%26.45%-20.91%23.53%-7.87%31.99%-7.29%

Correlation

The correlation between PSF and PFFA is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2018

0.44

The correlation between PSF and PFFA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSF vs. PFFA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PSF
PSF Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
PSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSF Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
PSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSF Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

PFFA
PFFA Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
PFFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFFA Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
PFFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFFA Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PSF vs. PFFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Select Preferred and Income Fund (PSF) and Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PSFPFFADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.16

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.32

1.04

-0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.02

3.00

-1.98

PSF vs. PFFA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSF Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the PFFA Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSF and PFFA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PSF vs. PFFA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSF drawdown since its inception was -55.01%, smaller than the maximum PFFA drawdown of -70.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSF and PFFA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSFPFFADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.01%

-70.52%

+15.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.28%

-6.49%

-0.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.23%

-12.15%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.76%

-22.70%

-18.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.69%

-2.63%

-6.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.97%

-6.57%

-3.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.27%

2.25%

+0.02%

Volatility

PSF vs. PFFA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Select Preferred and Income Fund (PSF) is 2.02%, while Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA) has a volatility of 2.42%. This indicates that PSF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSFPFFADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.02%

2.42%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.21%

6.50%

+0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.66%

7.63%

+1.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.11%

11.60%

+2.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.08%

31.54%

-10.46%

PSF vs. PFFA - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSF has a 4.28% expense ratio, which is higher than PFFA's 1.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSF vs. PFFA - Dividend Comparison

PSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.76%, less than PFFA's 9.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFFA
Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF
9.92%9.47%9.18%9.56%10.75%7.64%8.54%10.02%5.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PSF
Cohen & Steers Select Preferred and Income Fund
7.76%7.46%7.65%8.29%8.65%9.08%7.02%6.55%8.68%7.70%9.35%8.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSF and PFFA have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFFA has higher volatility (2.42%) compared to PSF (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSF dropped -55.01% vs PFFA's -70.52%.

PFFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSF and PFFA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer