PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSF vs. HPI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSF vs. HPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Select Preferred and Income Fund (PSF) and John Hancock Preferred Income Fund (HPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSF achieves a -0.01% return, which is significantly lower than HPI's 2.67% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PSF having a 4.91% annualized return and HPI not far behind at 4.84%.


PSF

1D
-0.10%
1M
-1.23%
YTD
-0.01%
6M
0.36%
1Y
8.46%
3Y*
11.22%
5Y*
0.11%
10Y*
4.91%

HPI

1D
-0.30%
1M
-0.42%
YTD
2.67%
6M
-0.69%
1Y
11.97%
3Y*
12.84%
5Y*
3.23%
10Y*
4.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSF vs. HPI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSF
Cohen & Steers Select Preferred and Income Fund
-0.01%10.63%12.84%9.88%-24.55%3.89%-3.78%42.60%-9.01%16.79%
HPI
John Hancock Preferred Income Fund
2.67%6.54%14.95%8.34%-15.79%13.16%-7.02%30.89%-4.79%13.78%

Correlation

The correlation between PSF and HPI is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2010

0.41

The correlation between PSF and HPI shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (all time) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSF vs. HPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSF
PSF Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
PSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSF Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
PSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSF Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

HPI
HPI Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
HPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
HPI Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
HPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
HPI Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSF vs. HPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Select Preferred and Income Fund (PSF) and John Hancock Preferred Income Fund (HPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSFHPIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.00

1.34

-0.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.46

1.95

-0.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.26

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.16

1.29

-0.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.96

3.50

+0.47

PSF vs. HPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSF Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is comparable to the HPI Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSF and HPI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSFHPIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

1.34

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

0.21

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

0.20

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.26

+0.12

Drawdowns

PSF vs. HPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSF drawdown since its inception was -55.01%, smaller than the maximum HPI drawdown of -67.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSF and HPI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSFHPIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.01%

-67.67%

+12.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.28%

-9.12%

+1.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.23%

-18.91%

+6.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.80%

-30.10%

-10.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.01%

-57.99%

+2.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.11%

-3.08%

-6.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.99%

-8.46%

-1.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

3.36%

-1.24%

Volatility

PSF vs. HPI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Select Preferred and Income Fund (PSF) is 2.85%, while John Hancock Preferred Income Fund (HPI) has a volatility of 3.16%. This indicates that PSF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSFHPIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

3.16%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.94%

7.27%

-0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.53%

8.95%

-0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.26%

15.82%

-1.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.12%

24.32%

-3.20%

PSF vs. HPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSF has a 4.28% expense ratio, which is higher than HPI's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSF vs. HPI - Dividend Comparison

PSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.69%, less than HPI's 9.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HPI
John Hancock Preferred Income Fund
9.19%9.15%8.91%9.39%9.23%7.14%7.53%7.69%8.92%7.84%8.26%7.69%
PSF
Cohen & Steers Select Preferred and Income Fund
7.69%7.46%7.65%8.29%8.65%9.08%7.02%6.55%8.68%7.70%9.35%8.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSF and HPI have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HPI has higher volatility (3.16%) compared to PSF (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSF dropped -55.01% vs HPI's -67.67%.

HPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSF and HPI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer