PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSF vs. FTCVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSF vs. FTCVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Select Preferred and Income Fund (PSF) and Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class M (FTCVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSF achieves a -0.27% return, which is significantly lower than FTCVX's 25.12% return. Over the past 10 years, PSF has underperformed FTCVX with an annualized return of 4.89%, while FTCVX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.86% annualized return.


PSF

1D
-0.25%
1M
-0.53%
YTD
-0.27%
6M
0.00%
1Y
7.64%
3Y*
11.12%
5Y*
0.00%
10Y*
4.89%

FTCVX

1D
1.14%
1M
7.34%
YTD
25.12%
6M
24.55%
1Y
43.73%
3Y*
19.61%
5Y*
9.41%
10Y*
12.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSF vs. FTCVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSF
Cohen & Steers Select Preferred and Income Fund
-0.27%10.63%12.84%9.88%-24.55%3.89%-3.78%42.60%-9.01%16.79%
FTCVX
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class M
25.12%17.67%7.70%12.42%-15.82%9.35%41.70%27.83%-1.88%8.54%

Correlation

The correlation between PSF and FTCVX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2010

0.34

The correlation between PSF and FTCVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (all time) to 0.48 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSF vs. FTCVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSF
PSF Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
PSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSF Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
PSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSF Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

FTCVX
FTCVX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FTCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FTCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSF vs. FTCVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Select Preferred and Income Fund (PSF) and Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class M (FTCVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSFFTCVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.52

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.05

6.27

-5.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.59

24.46

-20.86

PSF vs. FTCVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSF Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is lower than the FTCVX Sharpe Ratio of 3.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSF and FTCVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSFFTCVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

3.03

-2.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

0.70

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

0.94

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

1.00

-0.62

Drawdowns

PSF vs. FTCVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSF drawdown since its inception was -55.01%, which is greater than FTCVX's maximum drawdown of -25.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSF and FTCVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSFFTCVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.01%

-25.10%

-29.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.28%

-7.16%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.23%

-18.91%

+6.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.80%

-24.45%

-16.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.01%

-25.10%

-29.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.34%

0.00%

-9.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.99%

-5.85%

-4.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

1.83%

+0.30%

Volatility

PSF vs. FTCVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Select Preferred and Income Fund (PSF) is 2.71%, while Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class M (FTCVX) has a volatility of 4.87%. This indicates that PSF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTCVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSFFTCVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.71%

4.87%

-2.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.92%

11.86%

-4.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.54%

14.85%

-6.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.26%

13.49%

+0.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.12%

13.66%

+7.46%

PSF vs. FTCVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSF has a 4.28% expense ratio, which is higher than FTCVX's 1.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSF vs. FTCVX - Dividend Comparison

PSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.71%, less than FTCVX's 8.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTCVX
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class M
8.41%10.89%1.66%3.03%3.18%20.07%10.32%2.74%9.06%3.78%4.32%9.73%
PSF
Cohen & Steers Select Preferred and Income Fund
7.71%7.46%7.65%8.29%8.65%9.08%7.02%6.55%8.68%7.70%9.35%8.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSF and FTCVX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTCVX has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to PSF (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSF dropped -55.01% vs FTCVX's -25.10%.

FTCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSF and FTCVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer