PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTCVX vs. FCVSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTCVX vs. FCVSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class M (FTCVX) and Fidelity Convertible Securities Fund (FCVSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FTCVX having a 23.49% return and FCVSX slightly higher at 23.80%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FTCVX having a 12.85% annualized return and FCVSX not far ahead at 12.91%.


FTCVX

1D
-0.18%
1M
2.90%
YTD
23.49%
6M
21.58%
1Y
40.40%
3Y*
18.59%
5Y*
8.63%
10Y*
12.85%

FCVSX

1D
-0.16%
1M
2.93%
YTD
23.80%
6M
11.84%
1Y
29.51%
3Y*
17.26%
5Y*
8.14%
10Y*
12.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTCVX vs. FCVSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTCVX
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class M
23.49%17.67%7.70%12.42%-15.82%9.35%41.70%27.83%-1.88%8.54%
FCVSX
Fidelity Convertible Securities Fund
23.80%8.52%13.91%11.42%-15.33%9.95%42.52%28.58%-1.29%9.03%

Correlation

The correlation between FTCVX and FCVSX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2009

1.00

The correlation between FTCVX and FCVSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTCVX vs. FCVSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTCVX
FTCVX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FTCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FTCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

FCVSX
FCVSX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
FCVSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCVSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCVSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
FCVSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCVSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTCVX vs. FCVSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class M (FTCVX) and Fidelity Convertible Securities Fund (FCVSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTCVXFCVSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.32

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.73

2.83

+2.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.65

8.54

+12.11

FTCVX vs. FCVSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTCVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is higher than the FCVSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTCVX and FCVSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTCVX vs. FCVSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTCVX drawdown since its inception was -25.10%, smaller than the maximum FCVSX drawdown of -58.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTCVX and FCVSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTCVXFCVSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.10%

-58.76%

+33.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.16%

-10.68%

+3.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.91%

-14.56%

-4.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.45%

-24.18%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.10%

-25.08%

-0.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.30%

-1.27%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.84%

-7.22%

+1.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

3.52%

-1.54%

Volatility

FTCVX vs. FCVSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class M (FTCVX) and Fidelity Convertible Securities Fund (FCVSX) have volatilities of 6.41% and 6.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTCVXFCVSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.41%

6.41%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.91%

16.18%

-3.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.87%

18.39%

-2.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.71%

14.12%

-0.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.77%

13.97%

-0.20%

FTCVX vs. FCVSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTCVX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than FCVSX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTCVX vs. FCVSX - Dividend Comparison

FTCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.52%, more than FCVSX's 1.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCVSX
Fidelity Convertible Securities Fund
1.48%2.21%7.47%2.13%3.78%20.64%10.75%3.28%9.86%4.11%4.90%10.41%
FTCVX
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class M
8.52%10.89%1.66%3.03%3.18%20.07%10.32%2.74%9.06%3.78%4.32%9.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FTCVX and FCVSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FCVSX has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to FTCVX (6.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTCVX dropped -25.10% vs FCVSX's -58.76%.

FTCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTCVX and FCVSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer