PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTCVX vs. FACVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTCVX vs. FACVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class M (FTCVX) and Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class A (FACVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FTCVX having a 23.71% return and FACVX slightly higher at 23.82%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FTCVX having a 12.73% annualized return and FACVX not far ahead at 12.85%.


FTCVX

1D
0.90%
1M
6.49%
YTD
23.71%
6M
24.09%
1Y
43.10%
3Y*
19.16%
5Y*
8.94%
10Y*
12.73%

FACVX

1D
0.90%
1M
6.50%
YTD
23.82%
6M
24.22%
1Y
43.46%
3Y*
18.85%
5Y*
8.88%
10Y*
12.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTCVX vs. FACVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTCVX
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class M
23.71%17.67%7.70%12.42%-15.82%9.35%41.70%27.83%-1.88%8.54%
FACVX
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class A
23.82%17.95%7.92%11.06%-15.59%9.63%42.09%28.21%-1.59%8.77%

Correlation

The correlation between FTCVX and FACVX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2009

1.00

The correlation between FTCVX and FACVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTCVX vs. FACVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTCVX
FTCVX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FTCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FTCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

FACVX
FACVX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FACVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FACVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FACVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FACVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FACVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTCVX vs. FACVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class M (FTCVX) and Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class A (FACVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTCVXFACVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.96

2.99

-0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.82

3.85

-0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.51

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.10

6.15

-0.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

23.82

24.15

-0.33

FTCVX vs. FACVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTCVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.96, which is comparable to the FACVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTCVX and FACVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTCVXFACVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.96

2.99

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.66

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

0.95

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

1.01

-0.02

Drawdowns

FTCVX vs. FACVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTCVX drawdown since its inception was -25.10%, roughly equal to the maximum FACVX drawdown of -25.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTCVX and FACVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTCVXFACVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.10%

-25.09%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.16%

-7.15%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.91%

-18.91%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.45%

-24.32%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.10%

-25.09%

-0.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.85%

-5.76%

-0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

1.82%

+0.01%

Volatility

FTCVX vs. FACVX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class M (FTCVX) and Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class A (FACVX) have volatilities of 4.81% and 4.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTCVXFACVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.81%

4.79%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.86%

11.82%

+0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.85%

14.81%

+0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.49%

13.47%

+0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.65%

13.65%

0.00%

FTCVX vs. FACVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTCVX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than FACVX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTCVX vs. FACVX - Dividend Comparison

FTCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.50%, less than FACVX's 8.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FACVX
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class A
8.74%11.18%1.85%1.86%3.48%20.42%10.56%3.04%9.55%3.89%4.62%10.02%
FTCVX
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class M
8.50%10.89%1.66%3.03%3.18%20.07%10.32%2.74%9.06%3.78%4.32%9.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FTCVX and FACVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FTCVX has higher volatility (4.81%) compared to FACVX (4.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTCVX dropped -25.10% vs FACVX's -25.09%.

FACVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 2.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTCVX and FACVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer